JustinTimeCuber
Legend
I think that the WCA should add a meta-averages ranking. The specifics would have to be worked out, but how it would work in general would be that it averages your most recent 12 official averages, not counting the best and the worst. If you have 11 averages, then only your best is removed. If you have 10 or fewer, then you have no meta-average.
My only two meta-averages are:
3x3: 12.17
2x2: 4.65
Meta-average rankings would be much more fluid. If Feliks were having a bad year and got a "slow" meta-average, someone would take his place, without having to beat his best-ever meta-average.
My only two meta-averages are:
3x3: 12.17
2x2: 4.65
Meta-average rankings would be much more fluid. If Feliks were having a bad year and got a "slow" meta-average, someone would take his place, without having to beat his best-ever meta-average.