[WR] Feliks Zemdegs - 5x5 Average 50.15 & Single 46.97

look at this symbol:
~
it means:
Approximately. Not exactly. Maybe 50 would be more accurate than 55, but only by 3-4 seconds. It isn't a big deal. Also, If Feliks is consistently sub-7 like you imply, then why does he only have 4 sub 7 averages during his last 30 rounds of 3x3? That is only around 13%. You would expect at least 30%, taking into account stress from competitions.

You are simply insulting Feliks.

3x3: 7
4x4: sub30
5x5: sub55
6x6: sub1:50
7x7: ~2:35
 
You are simply insulting Feliks.

3x3: 7
4x4: sub30
5x5: sub55
6x6: sub1:50
7x7: ~2:35

If someone posted my averages like this:
3x3: ~15
4x4: ~1:15
2x2: ~5
Pyraminx: ~10
I wouldn't be offended or feel insulted. Maybe those are a bit slower than what I really average, but how different really is, say, 1:12 from 1:15, or low 4 from 5? The numbers are pretty close together. It's called approximation. I don't ACTUALLY think Feliks averages 55 on 3x3. I do think, however, that ~55 could mean anything from around 51 to 59. Also, some people don't know exactly what he averages, so they may go in the opposite direction (ex. to 55 instead of 50). ~ = approximately.
 
If someone posted my averages like this:
3x3: ~15
4x4: ~1:15
2x2: ~5
Pyraminx: ~10
I wouldn't be offended or feel insulted. Maybe those are a bit slower than what I really average, but how different really is, say, 1:12 from 1:15, or low 4 from 5? The numbers are pretty close together. It's called approximation. I don't ACTUALLY think Feliks averages 55 on 3x3. I do think, however, that ~55 could mean anything from around 51 to 59. Also, some people don't know exactly what he averages, so they may go in the opposite direction (ex. to 55 instead of 50). ~ = approximately.

Well, saying that he solves 4x4 in 35s is insulting anyway.
 
Back
Top