PenguinsDontFly
Member
Guys, this is Rubik's Cubes.
Quit being so serious.
get out.
Guys, this is Rubik's Cubes.
Quit being so serious.
Guys, this is Rubik's Cubes.
Quit being so serious.
This was because the 1.89 at your competition did not follow regulations. The solve was completed in under 7 moves. For skewb, the scramble is required to be a minimum of seven moves for an optimal solution. For 3x3 solving, the solution has to be 13 moves or greater for an optimal solution.
This is why Akash Rupela's solve was allowed for example. But this one you linked, and Nathan Soria's one were not.
That, and they're a lot slower than people, except for the REALLY good ones.I have a (maybe stupid) idea, why don't we have like this mini legorobots to scramble cubes? they never (or maybe 1/1000000) gonna make a mistake, the only downside is that it's gonna cost a bit of money :/
This can be compared to solving the cube in the competition. What if everyone would stop competing because they might get +2's or DNF's? We compete with the risk of getting these penalties if the rules aren't followed, scrambling shouldn't be any different from that
I think the result is legit, but I suggest faz give up the record.
There was also sq1 WR with wrong scramble, but he thought it was too fast at that time, so he give up the record.
6.88 is too much improvement from 8.27, so it cause the growth of OH event hugely