[Unofficial] 2x2 Ao5 9.55 (with a 4.73 single) all using beginners method!

[CuberRiley]

Hi guys! Check out my new video, I got a 9.65 Ao5 on 2x2, but there's a twist; I only used beginners method
I hope you like it!

http://youtu.be/Jr_vnaKlF9Q

 

[Randomno]

Why did you not film/count the 16.90?

 

[TDM]

but there's a twist; I only used beginners method

How is that a 'twist'? You just don't know any other method...

also nice idea with cutting out scrambling so nobody notices you not including the bad time

also you didn't remember to delete the 16 when calculating the average so the Ao5 was actually 9.20

 

[NewCuber000]

Haha I noticed the cutting of the 16 second solve too. However you're not fooling anyone but yourself.

 

[JeffDelucia]

9.55 ao5 with beginners translates to 1.22 ao5 with full eg, this should be UWR

 

[DeeDubb]

No one is ever going to believe any of your videos if you keep being dishonest. You're giving my hometown a horrible reputation.

I don't know why you'd rather have bad attention than no attention.

Why don't you stop making videos until you actually know how to solve a cube well, then maybe you can make videos that people will like without being deceptive.

 

[supercavitation]

No one is ever going to believe any of your videos if you keep being dishonest. You're giving my hometown a horrible reputation.

I don't know why you'd rather have bad attention than no attention.

Why don't you stop making videos until you actually know how to solve a cube well, then maybe you can make videos that people will like without being deceptive.

I think that was the most aggressive thing I've ever seen you say.

But yeah, basically, wait until you know what you're doing.

 

[Randomno]

9.55 ao5 with beginners translates to 1.22 ao5 with full eg, this should be UWR

UWR is 1.0x anyway.

No one is ever going to believe any of your videos if you keep being dishonest. You're giving my hometown a horrible reputation.

I don't know why you'd rather have bad attention than no attention.

Why don't you stop making videos until you actually know how to solve a cube well, then maybe you can make videos that people will like without being deceptive.

I don't really think badly skipping a solve is dishonest.

 

[DeeDubb]

I think that was the most aggressive thing I've ever seen you say.

But yeah, basically, wait until you know what you're doing.

This is not the first video he's made that's dishonest.

I've seen people try to get into making videos before they have cubing skills to back it up, but I've never seen it done this way.

It will take him less than a month to actually be decent enough if he stops spending all his time filming and editing videos that people don't really want to see, and spends it practicing.

 

[theROUXbiksCube]

This is not the first video he's made that's dishonest.

I've seen people try to get into making videos before they have cubing skills to back it up, but I've never seen it done this way.

It will take him less than a month to actually be decent enough if he stops spending all his time filming and editing videos that people don't really want to see, and spends it practicing.

I agree, its not been only me whose lost patience. I respect you for being more mature than me though, nice assertive-aggressive attitude! i dig it

 

[Thatoneguy2]

Lol, not really digging this guy. I like how at the end he casually says his pb is 1.68, I'm sure he got that. :rolleyes: (I guess it could have been a 2 move scramble, but those don't count.)

 

[TraciAG]

Lol, not really digging this guy. I like how at the end he casually says his pb is 1.68, I'm sure he got that. :rolleyes: (I guess it could have been a 2 move scramble, but those don't count.)

Getting a 1.xx single while you still average 10+ is not that hard, even with full steps.

I averaged 16 sec when I got my first 2 second solve. I got my first 1.xx single when I averaged (and still average) 6-7 sec

 

[Rocky0701]

Lol, not really digging this guy. I like how at the end he casually says his pb is 1.68, I'm sure he got that. :rolleyes: (I guess it could have been a 2 move scramble, but those don't count.)

All you have to do to do a sub 2 solve on a 4 move scramble is be able to pick up the cube quickly and know when it's solved.

 

[Thatoneguy2]

Getting a 1.xx single while you still average 10+ is not that hard, even with full steps.

I averaged 16 sec when I got my first 2 second solve. I got my first 1.xx single when I averaged (and still average) 6-7 sec

Well I guess I just suck at easy scrambles then. When I got a 4 move scramble I still have to recognize a when it's solved. And this guy doesn't average 6-7 seconds, more like 10-11 I think.

 

[uyneb2000]

Please stop being dishonest with your times, we honestly don't care how slow you actually are. I saw you at Rose City, and you're not that bad of a guy, I really wish you didn't fake your times. Just own up and post some actual averages.