Maskow: 50 cubes multiblind attempts

[STOCKY7]

Absolutely insane!!!

Maskow you are a true legend!!

Now to replicate in competition... You got this.

 

[Ingo]

Simply amazing. Mindblowing.

 

[supercavitation]

Holy... that's incredible!!

What character is the new mask?

 

[qqwref]

Amazing! Will you go for 50/50? Or perhaps 52/52, one cube for each card in a deck?

 

[Rocky0701]

Amazing! Will you go for 50/50? Or perhaps 52/52, one cube for each card in a deck?

52 would also double the second place MBLD score. Nice freaking job Maskow! You never cease to amaze me.

 

[Deathranger999]

Use more awesome Pokemon music for your official attempt (and I'm sure, success) video.

 

[Maskow]

48 points!!! Crazy. Are you going to continue training this hard?

It's a shame the final reaction is cut off.

I am going to continiue training and still post my 50 cubes attempts here. I have 1 month to my next competitions and I'm still sure that I can cut another 4-5 minutes.
The "final reaction" was 15 minutes after solve. I didn't cut off anything in the video.

P.s. I dont know how hard/impossible it would be but gogogo
60/60 in 1hour! 1minute/cube would be cool

It's definitely possible.

What character is the new mask?

Mordekaiser es numero uno, hue hue hue hue.

Amazing! Will you go for 50/50? Or perhaps 52/52, one cube for each card in a deck?

I'm not sure if 50/50 sub1 will happen soon. 100% accuracy is very hard to get. It's sad that my result, current UWR by 7 points, won't be in your ranking because somebody did 50/50 in 5 hours ;]

And of course I will try more cubes. Maybe soon, but not now, I'm not ready.

 

[goodatthis]

A quick question:

Lets say you're trying a new amount of cubes, like 50. Do you try to focus on accuracy first, and be as accurate as possible, and then work on speed, or do you work on speed first, then accuracy later?

 

[qqwref]

I'm not sure if 50/50 sub1 will happen soon. 100% accuracy is very hard to get. It's sad that my result, current UWR by 7 points, won't be in your ranking because somebody did 50/50 in 5 hours ;]

Too bad, 50 is such a nice round number You'll have to try some other number, or get a 50/50... hehe

 

[Stefan]

Too bad, 50 is such a nice round number

54 is nice, too (number of stickers on a 3x3).

 

[Randomno]

54 is nice, too (number of stickers on a 3x3).

56 is nice too.

Number of pieces on a 2x4x7.

 

[GG]

56 is nice too.

Number of pieces on a 2x4x7.

No... I don't know if a 2x4x7 exists, but if one did it would have 100 stickers.

Two sides that are 2x4, (2x8) =16 stickers
Two sides that are 2x7, (2x14) = 28 stickers
Two sides that are 4x7, (2x28) = 56 stickers

16+28+56=100 stickers

 

[JediJupiter]

No... I don't know if a 2x4x7 exists, but if one did it would have 100 stickers.

Two sides that are 2x4, (2x8) =16 stickers
Two sides that are 2x7, (2x14) = 28 stickers
Two sides that are 4x7, (2x28) = 56 stickers

16+28+56=100 stickers

He said pieces, in which case it is just 2x4x7 which is 56.

 

[guysensei1]

He said pieces, in which case it is just 2x4x7 which is 56.

a 2x4x7 does not have 56 pieces in the same way that a 6x6x6 does not have 216 pieces.

But let's not go off topic here. Maskow, you're amazing!

 

[Maskow]

I added 12th attempt.
It seems like I still need some practice ;]

 

[Jokern]

a 2x4x7 does not have 56 pieces in the same way that a 6x6x6 does not have 216 pieces.

But let's not go off topic here. Maskow, you're amazing!

You are correct about the 6x6x6, but not about the 2x4x7. The 2x4x7 has 56 pieces just like the 2x2x2 has 8 pieces. If any side is 1 or 2 layers there is no "internal cubies" that would be counted by just multiplying the sides together.

 

[guysensei1]

You are correct about the 6x6x6, but not about the 2x4x7. The 2x4x7 has 56 pieces just like the 2x2x2 has 8 pieces. If any side is 1 or 2 layers there is no "internal cubies" that would be counted by just multiplying the sides together.

whoa whoa whoa a 2x2x2 does NOT have 8 pieces. Go count.

(unless of course, you meant EXTERNAL pieces...)

 

[Berd]

Hahaha, I got my friends to toast to your success at dinner

 

[EMI]

whoa whoa whoa a 2x2x2 does NOT have 8 pieces. Go count.

(unless of course, you meant EXTERNAL pieces...)

Of course he means external pieces, he's talking about memorizing the puzzles. Also I own a fully working 2x2x2 which is actually made of only eight pieces.

 

[JasonDL13]

I was talking talking to my friend on skype when I asked:

JasonDL13: Did I tell you about Maskow's accomplishment?
Friend: maybe
JasonDL13: MBLD 49/50, 58:25 UWR
Friend: you talk so much about him idk
Friend: lol

I thought that was kinda funny