Fine, "Nobody in search of practicality uses a speedsolving method to solve it blindfolded," happy now?
I wasn't going to explain everything about blindfolded solving to people who don't understand it in the slightest. If I was talking to cubers, obviously I would explain things differently. As you could tell, the post was already long enough, I wasn't going to make it longer. I'm aware that people have done blindsolves with CFOP as well, but I wasn't going to explain to those ignorant 12 year olds what CFOP was, then what SpeedBLD was, then compare CFOP and LBL, and finally explain why it's not feasible for someone of that YouTube guy's experience level to do SpeedBLD with LBL.
I think you have a problem with understanding context. If I say it's "completely fake" and I go on to talk about blindfolded solving and that only, with no mention of Legos, then I am saying that the blindfolded solve is fake, not the Legos. Why would you even assume I was talking about Legos? At this point all you are doing is nitpicking. (Even though that's all you normally do anyway)
Glad to see even cubers are ganging up on me. Except the difference here is instead of having 12 year olds addicted to a guy who eats cactus making irrelevant claims against me, it's a grown man.
. Later. Let me just already point out that in this response you like so much he said I ganged up on him, which is a bit difficult given that I'm a single person. You and him together, on the other hand... particularly since you're not offering any argument but are purely joining him...
