Fail UWR page...

  • Thread starter Thread starter GG
  • Start date Start date
It's as if the wiki were updated in different places by different people instead of a single person who always makes sure things stay consistent!

Also, it's mathematically possible for the avg100 record to be faster than the avg50 record.
 
It's as if the wiki were updated in different places by different people instead of a single person who always makes sure things stay consistent!

Also, it's mathematically possible for the avg100 record to be faster than the avg50 record.

Yes, it's mathematically possible, but the difference will be very small. Here we have as UWRs a 4.11 avg50 and a 3.99 avg100, which means that:
- the sum of the 98 counting times of the avg100 is 98*3.99 = 391.02 seconds;
- if we split the avg100 into two avg50, given that both non-counting times of the avg100 will also be non-counting times of their respective avg50s, the sum of the 48 counting times of at least one of them has to be smaller than half of 391.02, that is 195.51. Hence the avg50 is at most 195.56/41 = 4.07, which proves that 4.11 cannot be the avg50 UWR.

Apart from times, there is also MBLD where the listed UWR is worse than the official WR (39/41 against 41/41).
 
Last edited:
If you guys actually know that the some records are not up-to-date AND you are aware of people using that page, why don't you just edit it yourself? As long as you only change text and don't add/remove lines it's super easy to update times! If you want to add/remove categories you just copy-paste and if it doesn't work you just can always add in the "note" field something like "Damn, I broke it....", it should be a super easy fix for the wiki mods to do :) (Sorry wiki mods, but if he killed it he probably just added 1 line too much or forgot a line... I just corrected those types of errors last week or something, it took less than a minute)
 
Back
Top