• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[NAR] Rami Sbahi 39.10 Mean of 3 & 36.97 Single - 3x3x3 With Feet!

Very fast indeed. Weird turn style, and not so fast U moves. However, they result in great lookahead.

Y U NO list:

First solve:
Y U NO R2 U' R' U R U' x' U' z' U' R U' R' U' z U R Y-perm

Second solve:
Y U NO F' U' F U' R U2 R' last pair (EOLS)
Y U NO R U R' U' B' R' F R F' B (OLL, your alg seemed good too though)

Third solve:
N/A
 
Very fast indeed. Weird turn style, and not so fast U moves. However, they result in great lookahead.

Y U NO list:

First solve:
Y U NO R2 U' R' U R U' x' U' z' U' R U' R' U' z U R Y-perm

Second solve:
Y U NO F' U' F U' R U2 R' last pair (EOLS)
Y U NO R U R' U' B' R' F R F' B (OLL, your alg seemed good too though)

Third solve:
N/A

Thanks! My turn style is weird? lol U moves are still faster than rotating and no lookahead. I guess if I improve those I can get WR.

I should learn that Y perm. It just reminded me to learn the 2h one (R2 U' R2' U' R2 U R' F' R U R2 U' R' F R). I will do that.

Edge orientation wastes time on feet unless it is sledgehammer for me.

Maybe i'll switch to that oll, idk which would be faster (for feet).
 
Scrambles:

D F2 D2 L2 R2 F2 D2 B' F' L' D' R2 U B2 F' R' B' R2
R2 B2 L2 R2 D' F2 U' R2 B2 L2 U B R2 F U' B2 F' R F2 D L
D R2 U2 R2 B2 U L2 F2 D B2 U' F U' F2 R' D U' L' D' B U

If Brest could reconstruct please that would be soooooooooo useful!

And thanks a lot for the video waffle. Enjoyed watching from another angle! :D
 
Last edited:
This is the reason why he probably won't.

You want them reconstructed because it would be "cool" rather than because you think it would be useful.

You easily reconstruct it yourself because feet.

No, I do think it would be very useful. I want to be able to see my tps in all of the different metrics and all of the different details. Also, I can't really reconstruct with all of the other different stuff, like view how executed, etc.
 
No, I do think it would be very useful. I want to be able to see my tps in all of the different metrics and all of the different details. Also, I can't really reconstruct with all of the other different stuff, like view how executed, etc.

You should have said it would be "sooooooooooo useful" then ;)
 
Back
Top