shadowslice e
Legend
I don't have time to go through and work out the exact average but this page on kociemba's website goes into detail for a lot of scrambles.
World Record limit fo 3X3?
- Thread starter Camilo Chapman
- Start date
Loiloiloi
Veteran
Yeah but no one is ever going to have solves that match algorithmic TPS. Pretty sure Chris Olson gets nearly 20 TPS on a few PLLs, considering he sub-1s every PLL except F
Sajwo
Veteran
I think that the limit for 3x3 WR is 3 seconds. Maybe 3.5
I
IAmEpic2004
Guest
Oh sorry, I thought you meant the total time to solve
Competition Cuber
Veteran
How fast do you think that the limit for 3x3 WR single is?
My prediction is about sub-1.5
My prediction is about sub-1.5
Last edited:
Duncan Bannon
Veteran
Sub 2.3
RedJack22
Regular
There, in my opinion, is no way the 3x3 single could get below that! I think the lowest it could be would be about 2.5 seconds
shadowslice e
Legend
Well iirc tnoodle scrambles are min 13 moves optimal so possibly 1 second if we go for a few million years
Competition Cuber
Veteran
Well a T perm is 14 moves, and feliks did one in 17 TPS, soooo.....
Ronxu
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 629
- Location
- Kirkkonummi, Finland
- WCA ID
- 2010RONK01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Not the case anymore. 2 minimum.
CyanSandwich
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,615
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- WCA ID
- 2013NELS01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
The limit is somewhere between 0-0.3, under current regs.
DGCubes
Veteran
teboecubes
Veteran
When our species has achieved interstellar travel and inadvertently sends a signal to the aliens, they’ll discover the Rubik’s cube, which, with their evolved appendages, will be able to turn at extreme TPS, and with their quantum supercomputer-like intelligence, will be able to find an optimal solution in a fraction of the 15 second inspection period allowed by the WCA, and will be able to solve the 3x3 in less than the 0.38 robot WR.
just a possibility
just a possibility
Duncan Bannon
Veteran
To add to this. I don't mean this in a mean or discriminative way. But I do believe it will be set by somebody who has a small "disibilty." People that have these often have unusual skills. Like extreme pattern recognition, an ability to learn full 1LLL, insane TPS.
CyanSandwich
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,615
- Location
- Wellington, New Zealand
- WCA ID
- 2013NELS01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
True
I don't have a stackmat, but someone could easily prove the upper bound is 0.15 or something.
With the right hardware and a scramble like U D you could get it almost as fast as just a timer start/stop.
DGCubes
Veteran
True
I don't have a stackmat, but someone could easily prove the upper bound is 0.15 or something.
With the right hardware and a scramble like U D you could get it almost as fast as just a timer start/stop.
Just using the YueXiao that was lying on my desk, I was able to get 0.225 within a couple tries with the scramble U' D.
Doing a just-over-45-degree E layer move to scramble (which is technically okay), I was able to get it down to 0.154 (I also got a 0.113 with a really shady timer stop).
So your guess was right; so far we have bounds of [0.06, 0.15] for the limit of 3x3 single, lol. Interestingly, I've found that it's best to do these scrambles one-handed, keeping the other hand on the timer. So, if one of these scrambles ever showed up, the 3x3 WR could be done OH.
Mr.Roux86
Regular
About the whole TPS thing, I think we might have futuristic cubes that allow us to turn very fast. If someone had a 15 move solution with a 20-23tps? Sub 0.75
One Wheel
Legend
The limitation on TPS is more due to human physiology than cube hardware, I think.
Thom S.
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,276
1-Generator Last Layey is not the term you want to use. 1gll is just the AUFs
Similar threads
