Who the hell said anything about serial killers? The point is that is not something a lot of people will want to see.
I just assumed that by "disturbed" you meant something that could mess with your brain, which something so miniscule should not do. I do not oppose you taking it down, since you have power over this website I shouldn't stand in the way. I understand that things like these are considered "taboo" in society. All I am saying is that I don't think that they should be considered "taboo" seeing that everyone has one. I also think that if you consider a part of your own body to be "disturbing" or "disgusting", then you should probably see your entire body to be "disturbing" or "disgusting". I don't see much of a difference between solving with your hands or your penis, because "The end result is the same for everyone anyway: a solved cube".
Why do you insist on using such a narrow definition of the word "disturbed" when you know very well what we mean? Of course we are talking about this in the context of societal taboos and what is considered appropriate, not in the context of things that might make people become serial killers.
Just because you view one part of the body as "disgusting" doesn't automatically mean you view the whole thing as "disgusting". Where did you get that logic?
If forced to choose, would you rather lick the back of a stranger's hand, or the bottom of his foot (or possibly an even less inviting part)?
