Which cuber has the fastest turn speed?

Which cuber has the fastest turn speed?

  • Faz

    Votes: 166 60.4%
  • Rowe

    Votes: 27 9.8%
  • Erik Akkersdijk

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Harris Chan

    Votes: 6 2.2%
  • Kanneti Sae Han

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • Yu Nakajima

    Votes: 13 4.7%
  • Breandan

    Votes: 22 8.0%
  • Corny

    Votes: 8 2.9%
  • Any other

    Votes: 30 10.9%

  • Total voters
    275
And he is contradicting a guy whose main method is Roux, one that is known for spamming of M slice moves

Regarding M vs M':

The direction of S is obvious. Clockwise.

As for M and E, it's not that I think they should be reversed (I don't care either way), it's just that I understand why they were established the way that they are. E goes from left to right, and M goes top to bottom.

What angle? M is clockwise... So is M' depending on the angle.
 
Thank you for being obvious.

"Guys, my clock turns clockwise."
"No! It depends on the angle! Look at it from the back, and it's not clockwise!"
"..."


Dude...I was clarifying the point being made by Cool Frog because Julian obviously didn't get it; I was not making my own point.

And the clock example is stupid because you cannot see the clock face from the back. You can see an S move exactly the same from either side. A clock is moving clockwise because it is moving in that direction from the only set of angles from which you can actually see the clock face. An S, M, or E move cannot be called "clockwise" or "counterclockwise" without an arbitrary rule because those moves are directly in the middle of the cube, and so it is arbitrary which angle you should view them from to determine their direction.
 
You can see an S move exactly the same from either side.

You need at least two flat or one special mirror, though.

And the clock example is stupid because you cannot see the clock face from the back.

il_570xN.67048304.jpg
 
Last edited:
B should be switched so that clockwise or counterclockwise is judged from the front because nobody actually looks directly at the back of the cube

and I stand corrected with the clock; I was thinking specifically along the lines of an ordinary small hanging on the wall clock
 
I got it just fine, thanks.

orly? is that why you responded like this?

What angle? M is clockwise... So is M' depending on the angle.

Please reread my post. S is clockwise, I wasn't talking about M.

He was making the point that whether S is clockwise or not depends on what angle you look at it, exactly the same as the whole M vs. M' argument that Owen loves making. You just respond once again saying "S is clockwise", when it is not a fact, it is arbitrary; that is exactly what Cool Frog was pointing out.
 
Last edited:
I admit that my statement was incorrect, but on literally every single clock I ever actually see in my life, you cannot see the clock face from the back.

I understand, but don't base your argument on what only you have seen yourself, not believing that it's possible simply because of that.
Here are some clocks that you can see which way it's spinning from behind. My grandma has one, too, but I can't find it online.


13211.jpg

z000.jpg

seethru1.jpg
 
He was making the point that whether S is clockwise or not depends on what angle you look at it, exactly the same as the whole M vs. M' argument that Owen loves making. You just respond once again saying "S is clockwise", when it is not a fact, it is arbitrary; that is exactly what Cool Frog was pointing out.
Alright, I understand your (or Cool Frog's) point a little better now, but still, when you hold the cube at an angle from which S isn't clockwise, the B-face effectively becomes the F-face. That is why I think that S is less arbitrary than M or E.
 
when you hold the cube at an angle from which S isn't clockwise, the B-face effectively becomes the F-face. That is why I think that S is less arbitrary than M or E.

It definitely makes sense; Cool Frog, and then I, were just being lolnitpicky about it ;)
And sorry, I just read over my posts again and I definitely sounded more b****y than I wanted to


Woah, just realized how off-topic I just pushed this thread lol...though is there actually any point in continuing discussion on the original topic?
 
Back
Top