meichenl
Regular
I've recently been reading the literature on expert performance to prepare a report for a class. Researchers support a few different ideas about why some people achieve better performances than others in any given discipline. Specifically, there is debate over the importance of natural genetic ability, practice time and type, and environment in determining how accomplished you become.
Speed-solving Rubik's cubes is an ideal place to study expert performance because it is easy to quantify how fast you are, and due to the WCA database, we can see not only how fast people are, but their entire history of improvement.
I'm interested looking at the relationships between practice habits, attitudes towards cubing, and cubing speed. If you have ten minutes (or fifteen you if answer questions more carefully), please respond to my survey on SurveyMonkey.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/PQZKHKN
Once the results are in, I'll report back with whatever I find.
This is an informal survey; I don't plan on using this for an academic publication, so self-reported data will be fine.
Also, I'd be happy to hear your opinions on the relative importance of talent, practice, and environment in cubing. If you have any questions about the survey or questions that I can answer based on what I've read about expertise, I'll do my best.
If you're on any cubing mailing lists, feel free to forward this link.
Thank you,
Mark
Speed-solving Rubik's cubes is an ideal place to study expert performance because it is easy to quantify how fast you are, and due to the WCA database, we can see not only how fast people are, but their entire history of improvement.
I'm interested looking at the relationships between practice habits, attitudes towards cubing, and cubing speed. If you have ten minutes (or fifteen you if answer questions more carefully), please respond to my survey on SurveyMonkey.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/PQZKHKN
Once the results are in, I'll report back with whatever I find.
This is an informal survey; I don't plan on using this for an academic publication, so self-reported data will be fine.
Also, I'd be happy to hear your opinions on the relative importance of talent, practice, and environment in cubing. If you have any questions about the survey or questions that I can answer based on what I've read about expertise, I'll do my best.
If you're on any cubing mailing lists, feel free to forward this link.
Thank you,
Mark
Last edited: