That70sShowDude
Veteran
Ok, based off of everybody elses %'s, I was right. My times should be better compared to my 3x3. I mean, I'm near Rowe on 3x3 %. My 4x4 % just flat out sucks compared to anybody. I really need a decent 4x4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh my gawd.. I already know this isn't going to be pretty.
2x2: 2.7 - 0.675%
3x3: 11.7 - 2.925%
4x4: 85 - 21.25%
5x5: 300 - 75%
total: ~400
It's blatantly obvious that I completely reject 5x5.
2x2 1.92
3x3 8.89
Take the total # of your AVG OF 12 times in seconds:
yeah on 2x2 when i get easy layers, less then 5 or 4 moves, i can usually one look. I practice doing it with 15 second inspection, but also with the spacebar, if i count with a stackmat its 2.10, but it barely makes a difference. As for 8.89 3x3, i had a 7 and like 3 low8s counting. im normally low 10.2x2 1.92
3x3 8.89
Take the total # of your AVG OF 12 times in seconds:
wat srsly? Not doubting your claim but, wow....
anyway:
2x2: 8
3x3: 26
4x4: 120
5x5: 300
(I've done < 10 5x5 solves....)
2x2: 1.76%
3x3: 5.73%
4x4: 26.4%
5x5: 66.1% :O
slow down feliks!
slow down feliks!
I agree, someone shoot his hand please.
slow down feliks!
I agree, someone shoot his hand please.
Well someone took it too far.
slow down feliks!
I agree, someone shoot his hand please.
Well someone took it too far.