What do you (normally) average for 2x2 using the ORTEGA method? (Poll)

  • Thread starter Thread starter CubeX
  • Start date Start date

What do you (normally) average for 2x2 using the ORTEGA method?


  • Total voters
    93
Maybe Rowe? Sub-3 is possible though right?

Sure, if you can keep up about 7tps a solve, it's fine. It just depends how good your pre-inspection lookahead is, and prediction of PBL.
I think if I worked at it long enough I could get there, but I find 2x2 a bit dull atm so I don't want to push it and get sick of it.

I don't think it's a good idea to have any presumptions about Rowe + Ortega, afaik he hasn't practiced a PBL based method for ages.
Ofc he could, though ;)
 
I find it hard to believe that someone averages sub-3 with Ortega, but I guess it would be possible if you used your inspection wisely...

I'm consistently sub-6 but switching to CLL now that I'm done OLL.
 
current avg100: 3.44 (σ = 0.64)

3.34, 2.69, 3.75, 2.72, 2.44, 2.31, 3.58, 3.28, 3.34, 3.93, 4.45, 3.29, 2.36, 4.23, 3.09, 3.12, 3.33, 4.34, 2.54, 3.76, 3.68, 3.34, 4.41, 4.00, 3.02, 4.22, 3.62, 4.36, 2.69, 3.03, 3.13, 4.79, 4.05, 2.56, 4.43, 4.03, 3.92, 2.77, 3.69, 3.57, 3.43, 2.88, 3.77, 3.68, 3.83, 4.08, 3.80, 2.87, 2.82, 3.44, 2.77, 3.62, 3.12, 3.92, 3.54, 3.68, 3.44, 4.71, 2.12, 3.33, 3.89, 3.33, 2.79, 4.58, 3.86, 2.88, 3.29, 2.82, 3.96, 4.40, 3.11, 2.52, 3.99, 2.35, 3.40, 3.89, 3.80, 2.53, 3.13, 4.44, 3.47, 4.49, 2.37, 3.47, 3.37, 3.37, 1.54, 4.06, 3.63, 4.12, 4.11, 0.95, 3.93, 3.57, 3.33, 3.53, 3.69, 2.26, 3.23, 3.12

I'm sure onionhoney could sub3 if he tried.
 
Back
Top