• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Weekly competition 2009-43

Mossar

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
58
WCA
2009MOSK01
I have one question: Why I have DNF in 2x2 event?
Because I and/or my program slipped up, sorry :eek:
I or it was mixing up 2x2 and 2x2 bld, did you actually do only the third
solve on 2x2 bld? (first?)

I'll fix it in a moment. It is easier for me if you write the whole event on one line
and then also if you don't mix decimal point and decimal comma freely. Like this
perhaps:

2x2: 3.94 ; (4.95) ; (3.30) ; 4.03 ; 4.55 = 4.17 Quite nice...
2x2 BLD: DNS ; DNS ; 1:26.44
Thanks, sorry for confusion in my post :)
 

ardi4nto

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
191
Location
Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
WCA
2009SATR01
YouTube
Visit Channel
3x3x3 fewest moves(13)
  1. 28 Tim Reynolds
  2. 29 guusrs
  3. 30 Jacco
  4. 32 Stini
  5. 32 ardi4nto
  6. 32 Mike Hughey
  7. 34 blah
  8. 35 TMOY
  9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
  10. 37 mande
  11. 44 Slash
  12. DNF Kian
  13. DNF Olivér Perge
I started to think why wouldn't we adopt WCA system for rank? I think it's more fair to give same points for the same results. so, it will be
1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
4. 32 ardi4nto
4. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
8. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
9. 37 mande
10. 44 Slash
11. DNF Kian
11. DNF Olivér Perge
 

MatsBergsten

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
2,675
Location
Bergshamra, Sweden
WCA
2008BERG04
3x3x3 fewest moves(13)
  1. 28 Tim Reynolds
  2. 29 guusrs
  3. 30 Jacco
  4. 32 Stini
  5. 32 ardi4nto
  6. 32 Mike Hughey
  7. 34 blah
  8. 35 TMOY
  9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
  10. 37 mande
  11. 44 Slash
  12. DNF Kian
  13. DNF Olivér Perge
I started to think why wouldn't we adopt WCA system for rank? I think it's more fair to give same points for the same results. so, it will be
1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
4. 32 ardi4nto
4. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
8. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
9. 37 mande
10. 44 Slash
11. DNF Kian
11. DNF Olivér Perge
You get equal points. Stini, you and Mike all shared 4-6 places.
The numbers for place comes from the Forum system numbering,
as an numbered list. And it does not "understand" the concept of
sharing places.
 

Cride5

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
1,226
Location
Scotland
WCA
2009RIDE01
3x3x3 fewest moves(13)
  1. 28 Tim Reynolds
  2. 29 guusrs
  3. 30 Jacco
  4. 32 Stini
  5. 32 ardi4nto
  6. 32 Mike Hughey
  7. 34 blah
  8. 35 TMOY
  9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
  10. 37 mande
  11. 44 Slash
  12. DNF Kian
  13. DNF Olivér Perge
Looks like the program missed my fewest moves entry. Is there something wrong with the format?
 

MichaelErskine

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2008
Messages
1,244
Location
Sherwood, Nottingham, UK
WCA
2008ERSK01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Processed results for 2009 to date are at http://www.tecspy.com/mick/weekly-comp-2009-01to43.zip

Contains results-wk43.tsv -- tab separated values, all competitors, all weeks, all events. Easily imported into popular spreadsheet software. Includes OpenOffice spreadsheet results-wk43.ods with AutoFilter for selecting events/competitors/etc. prior to creating nice charts!
 

Tim Major

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2009
Messages
5,381
Location
Melbourne, Australia
WCA
2010MAJO01
3x3x3 fewest moves(13)
  1. 28 Tim Reynolds
  2. 29 guusrs
  3. 30 Jacco
  4. 32 Stini
  5. 32 ardi4nto
  6. 32 Mike Hughey
  7. 34 blah
  8. 35 TMOY
  9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
  10. 37 mande
  11. 44 Slash
  12. DNF Kian
  13. DNF Olivér Perge
I started to think why wouldn't we adopt WCA system for rank? I think it's more fair to give same points for the same results. so, it will be
1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
4. 32 ardi4nto
4. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
8. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
9. 37 mande
10. 44 Slash
11. DNF Kian
11. DNF Olivér Perge
should be 8. 35
8. 35
10. 35
 

joey

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
4,410
WCA
2007GOUL01
YouTube
Visit Channel
FMC:
U' B' U R F2 R' F R2 F' D F' D' B2 (13 move 2x2x3 block)
F' R' F' R U' L F' L' (8 for EO)
U2 F U' F' U' F2 U F' U' F' U F U' F U (15 moves finish)
=> 36 moves


edit: just realised that I did an old competiton.
 
Last edited:

MatsBergsten

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
2,675
Location
Bergshamra, Sweden
WCA
2008BERG04
Looks like the program missed my fewest moves entry. Is there something wrong with the format?
Yes, please write the result on the same line as the event name. I can easily
understand that the result 8 lines further down is just that, but the program has
to read and try to filter away lots of info (and some event) on the way down.

I'll fix it tomorrow night when I'm home again, I can then add Joeys effort too
while I am at it :)

So just like this
3x3x3 fewest moves: 44 moves
and then how many explanations you like.
 

Cride5

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
1,226
Location
Scotland
WCA
2009RIDE01
Looks like the program missed my fewest moves entry. Is there something wrong with the format?
Yes, please write the result on the same line as the event name. I can easily
understand that the result 8 lines further down is just that, but the program has
to read and try to filter away lots of info (and some event) on the way down.

I'll fix it tomorrow night when I'm home again, I can then add Joeys effort too
while I am at it :)

So just like this
3x3x3 fewest moves: 44 moves
and then how many explanations you like.
Ah right, thanks. Fixed my post, but its probably too late ... noted for future :)
 
Top