Weekly competition 2009-43

[Tim Major]

Lol 3x3 top 2.

 

[Inf3rn0]

EDIT: Nevermind

 

[Mossar]

I have one question: Why I have DNF in 2x2 event?

Because I and/or my program slipped up, sorry
I or it was mixing up 2x2 and 2x2 bld, did you actually do only the third
solve on 2x2 bld? (first?)

I'll fix it in a moment. It is easier for me if you write the whole event on one line
and then also if you don't mix decimal point and decimal comma freely. Like this
perhaps:

2x2: 3.94 ; (4.95) ; (3.30) ; 4.03 ; 4.55 = 4.17 Quite nice...
2x2 BLD: DNS ; DNS ; 1:26.44

Thanks, sorry for confusion in my post

 

[ardi4nto]

3x3x3 fewest moves(13)

1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
5. 32 ardi4nto
6. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
10. 37 mande
11. 44 Slash
12. DNF Kian
13. DNF Olivér Perge

I started to think why wouldn't we adopt WCA system for rank? I think it's more fair to give same points for the same results. so, it will be
1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
4. 32 ardi4nto
4. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
8. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
9. 37 mande
10. 44 Slash
11. DNF Kian
11. DNF Olivér Perge

 

[MatsBergsten]

3x3x3 fewest moves(13)

1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
5. 32 ardi4nto
6. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
10. 37 mande
11. 44 Slash
12. DNF Kian
13. DNF Olivér Perge

I started to think why wouldn't we adopt WCA system for rank? I think it's more fair to give same points for the same results. so, it will be
1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
4. 32 ardi4nto
4. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
8. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
9. 37 mande
10. 44 Slash
11. DNF Kian
11. DNF Olivér Perge

You get equal points. Stini, you and Mike all shared 4-6 places.
The numbers for place comes from the Forum system numbering,
as an numbered list. And it does not "understand" the concept of
sharing places.

 

[SimonWestlund]

Yay! I won And I didn't even have time to participate in all the events that I would've wanted to I'm on Mallorca And I didn't have my 6x6 either. My Next goal is 300+ points

 

[Cride5]

3x3x3 fewest moves(13)

1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
5. 32 ardi4nto
6. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
10. 37 mande
11. 44 Slash
12. DNF Kian
13. DNF Olivér Perge

Looks like the program missed my fewest moves entry. Is there something wrong with the format?

 

[MichaelErskine]

Processed results for 2009 to date are at http://www.tecspy.com/mick/weekly-comp-2009-01to43.zip

Contains results-wk43.tsv -- tab separated values, all competitors, all weeks, all events. Easily imported into popular spreadsheet software. Includes OpenOffice spreadsheet results-wk43.ods with AutoFilter for selecting events/competitors/etc. prior to creating nice charts!

 

[Tim Major]

3x3x3 fewest moves(13)

1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
5. 32 ardi4nto
6. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
9. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
10. 37 mande
11. 44 Slash
12. DNF Kian
13. DNF Olivér Perge

I started to think why wouldn't we adopt WCA system for rank? I think it's more fair to give same points for the same results. so, it will be
1. 28 Tim Reynolds
2. 29 guusrs
3. 30 Jacco
4. 32 Stini
4. 32 ardi4nto
4. 32 Mike Hughey
7. 34 blah
8. 35 TMOY
8. 35 trying-to-speedcube...
9. 37 mande
10. 44 Slash
11. DNF Kian
11. DNF Olivér Perge

should be 8. 35
8. 35
10. 35

 

[joey]

FMC:
U' B' U R F2 R' F R2 F' D F' D' B2 (13 move 2x2x3 block)
F' R' F' R U' L F' L' (8 for EO)
U2 F U' F' U' F2 U F' U' F' U F U' F U (15 moves finish)
=> 36 moves


edit: just realised that I did an old competiton.

 

[Muesli]

I didn't do to bad.

 

[MatsBergsten]

Looks like the program missed my fewest moves entry. Is there something wrong with the format?

Yes, please write the result on the same line as the event name. I can easily
understand that the result 8 lines further down is just that, but the program has
to read and try to filter away lots of info (and some event) on the way down.

I'll fix it tomorrow night when I'm home again, I can then add Joeys effort too
while I am at it

So just like this
3x3x3 fewest moves: 44 moves
and then how many explanations you like.

 

[DavidWoner]

3x3 one handed(28)

1. 23.00 DavidWoner

lolwut

 

[Mossar]

3x3 one handed(28)

1. 23.00 DavidWoner

lolwut

1. 23.00 DavidWoner
2. 23.10 Mossar

0.10 ;D

 

[Cride5]

Looks like the program missed my fewest moves entry. Is there something wrong with the format?

Yes, please write the result on the same line as the event name. I can easily
understand that the result 8 lines further down is just that, but the program has
to read and try to filter away lots of info (and some event) on the way down.

I'll fix it tomorrow night when I'm home again, I can then add Joeys effort too
while I am at it

So just like this
3x3x3 fewest moves: 44 moves
and then how many explanations you like.

Ah right, thanks. Fixed my post, but its probably too late ... noted for future

 

[Ewks]

Funnily I'm in either exactly middle or near middle of the results in many events Only 4x4x4, pyraminx and 2-3-4- relay make exceptions.