WeCube Updates:

[cuber314159]

Welcome

 

[Jam88]

Hallo. Sorry if I'm being stupid, but what is WeCube?

 

[Nmile7300]

Hallo. Sorry if I'm being stupid, but what is WeCube?

It was an organization that started a while back (around a year ago if I remember correctly) where they would help cubers get sponsored. They helped get @Owen Morrison and @Micah Morrison sponsored by speedcubing.org.

 

[Jam88]

It was an organization that started a while back (around a year ago if I remember correctly) where they would help cubers get sponsored. They helped get @Owen Morrison and @Micah Morrison sponsored by speedcubing.org.

Ah ok thank you.

 

[ArbishAli]

Welcome!

 

[LNBFilms]

Yeah duh, not expecting a 14 year old immature kid to be Lukas Batema lol

Uhhh. I am Lukas Batema, and am 15, so I am close to 14 years of age... lol

for those of yall confused, I AM NOT LUKAS BATEMA. I do understand my name also is Lukas but im not Lukas Batema. That aint my name. Just sayin.

I am sorry if there was a mix-up in that, I think that people will now realize this. Thank you for your input!

Welcome

Thank you, Dan! I think you know who posted this! Lol. Jokes aside, thank you for helping WeCube! I am posting this from my personal account, since I am at school, and do not have the pass saved on my device at school. Sorry for the inconvenience this may have caused!

 

[ArbishAli]

Uhhh. I am Lukas Batema, and am 15, so I am close to 14 years of age... lol

I thought that Lukas Batema would be a grown up man lol.

 

[LNBFilms]

I thought that Lukas Batema would be a grown up man lol.

I guess I’ll take that as a compliment. Thank you! Lol.

It was an organization that started a while back (around a year ago if I remember correctly) where they would help cubers get sponsored. They helped get @Owen Morrison and @Micah Morrison sponsored by speedcubing.org.

Well, it really wasn’t an organization, because we did not have the legal Government documents to be one. We are more of a free enterprise of sorts. Also, we still are an enterprise, as we are working on stuff, as said in the original announcement. It just seems like we are gone, cause we have not spoken out in a while, as far as I know. Thank you!

Note to the mods: this was a member intro for our business acct and should be removed from the “WeCube Updates:” thread thank you, as I do not know why y’all do this, when it is not technically even related.

Btw here is one that you may be missing from a couple months ago if you really were trying to add them all together (which is how I know you are not)

Comment guesses of what we are doing in this picture
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/to...s-picture.78120/&share_type=t&link_source=app

 

[Nir1213]

I guess I’ll take that as a compliment. Thank you! Lol.

Well, it really wasn’t an organization, because we did not have the legal Government documents to be one. We are more of a free enterprise of sorts. Also, we still are an enterprise, as we are working on stuff, as said in the original announcement. It just seems like we are gone, cause we have not spoken out in a while, as far as I know. Thank you!

Note to the mods: this was a member intro for our business acct and should be removed from the “WeCube Updates:” thread thank you, as I do not know why y’all do this, when it is not technically even related.

Btw here is one that you may be missing from a couple months ago if you really were trying to add them all together (which is how I know you are not)

Comment guesses of what we are doing in this picture
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/topic?share_fid=36862&share_tid=78120&url=https://www.speedsolving.com/index.php?threads/Comment-guesses-of-what-we-are-doing-in-this-picture.78120/&share_type=t&link_source=app

they might have done that because they thought you are updating your business as you go, getting better, making changes, so yea
you can just list what you have done and ask for help regarding the business.

 

[LNBFilms]

they might have done that because they thought you are updating your business as you go, getting better, making changes, so yea
you can just list what you have done and ask for help regarding the business.

Dear fellow Speedsolvers,
That’s true, but usually Mod(s) are not supposed to merge threads with different OP’s, topics, etc. Also, they have not combined a thread RELATED to this thread in every way, shape, and form as this thread. I do tend to understand this, but us at WeCube had specifically made a new account to do a traditional, serious member intro to foreshadow a huge update and makeover/remodel of WeCube. I cannot say what it is now, but you will find out soon, if you check this forum daily, and subscribe to WeCubeUSA on YouTube. I am not trying to advertise, but this will help you understand WeCube in more depth.
Thank you all whom have replied to this thread, and we appreciate your input. Besides that, Y’all have shaped [mention]JackJack13 [/mention]and I into better marketing/businessmen. Also a huge shout-out and thank you to [mention]cuber314159 [/mention] for partnering with WeCube when no-one else would. You invested in something that will greatly change the community in general and in some specific means as well!
I would call what I am about to do, “Non-Advertisement Advertisement.” anyway, Since just getting off the topic of the Legacy Cubing Store, “Speedcubing.org” for partnering with WeCube, please go ahead and take the time and order from them. Be sure to use the code, “WECUBE” as we do not get anything from any usage of it. Nope, not even a commission. The reason I call that phrase I just put there, “Non-Advertisement Advertisment,” is now basically self-explanatory now by reading what I just typed.
Y’all may think WeCube is dead, plucked from existence. No, if we intended to “Inspire Greatness,” when we first entered as a free enterprise, then we intend to do so EVEN BETTER, when we return in full power. What I mean by that is, when we, “disappeared,” it may have looked like we were either, “dead,” or, “plucked from existence.” When we return in “full power,” meaning when we return fully remodeled/madeover. We will have the capacity to help the community even more than we could’ve without this major update.
Please pardon this message being posted a little bit later than the last post. I have no data/no WiFi on the bus on my way home from school, so I do not get updates on questions during that ride, as well as I do know I can edit it, but I have very little time to do so right now, because of school and this topic we are on at the moment. Thank you for your understanding, and have a great day!

Best wishes,


Lukas (Luni) Batema: WeCubeUSA Co-Founder (https://www.WeCubeUSA.com)

 

[Kit Clement]

Technically, you shouldn't even have this account by the forum rules:

c. One Account per Person
You are prohibited from having more than one account; multiple (‘alt’) accounts may be banned without warning. Infractions issued to alt accounts will be reissued to the corresponding primary accounts, in addition to other punishments. Do not create a new account to get around a ban or other punishment; these punishments will be extended or made permanent.

The purpose of the member introductions is to introduce new people to the forum, and neither of the people holding your WeCube account are new to the forum. I'm no moderator here, but it makes perfect sense to merge that thread into your already existing WeCube thread, as neither of the individuals nor WeCube need to be introduced. You said yourself that the whole point was to "foreshadow a huge update and makeover/remodel of WeCube," which seems like it belongs in WeCube updates, not to introduce an account that is against the rules anyway.

 

[LNBFilms]

Technically, you shouldn't even have this account by the forum rules:



The purpose of the member introductions is to introduce new people to the forum, and neither of the people holding your WeCube account are new to the forum. I'm no moderator here, but it makes perfect sense to merge that thread into your already existing WeCube thread, as neither of the individuals nor WeCube need to be introduced.

Dear Mr. Clement,
Technically, it is not for a singular person, it is for a free enterprise, and where in the rules does it say anything against having an account for business purposes, and one for personal? Thank you! Also you do make a very good point about the introduction thing, I did not think of that! I will ask my fellow co-founder about that though, thank you. We will delete the account with further notice about the rule interpretation from the moderators!

 

[Kit Clement]

Dear Mr. Clement,
Technically, it is not for a singular person, it is for a free enterprise, and where in the rules does it say anything against having an account for business purposes, and one for personal? Thank you!

The rule is one account per person.

You are a person. You have more than 1 account. That's against the rules.

I don't know why you refer to your business as a "free enterprise" when that's a theory of economics, not a type of business in itself. That's like saying you own a "capitalism." But whatever you call it, the business is not a person and is thus not entitled to any additional accounts. It doesn't need to be specifically forbidden in the rules to be against it - accounts are done by person and the WeCube account is held by people who already have accounts on the forum.

That being said, it seems like they've allowed the account given that they saw it in that thread they merged here, but either way, the point still stands that there's no need to introduce an account that represents an organization already existing here and is represented by members that have also been here for a long time. Merging the thread makes complete sense.

 

[Nir1213]

Dear Mr. Clement,
Technically, it is not for a singular person, it is for a free enterprise, and where in the rules does it say anything against having an account for business purposes, and one for personal? Thank you! Also you do make a very good point about the introduction thing, I did not think of that! I will ask my fellow co-founder about that though, thank you. We will delete the account with further notice about the rule interpretation from the moderators!

well now that i think about it it doesnt say anything about business being allowed in member intros

LNB Films said:
Dear Mr. Clement,
Technically, it is not for a singular person, it is for a free enterprise, and where in the rules does it say anything against having an account for business purposes, and one for personal? Thank you!

The rule is one account per person.

You are a person. You have more than 1 account. That's against the rules.

I don't know why you refer to your business as a "free enterprise" when that's a theory of economics, not a type of business in itself. That's like saying you own a "capitalism." But whatever you call it, the business is not a person and is thus not entitled to any additional accounts. It doesn't need to be specifically forbidden in the rules to be against it - accounts are done by person and the WeCube account is held by people who already have accounts on the forum.

American Speedcubing Kit

Who is his alt account?

 

[LNBFilms]

The rule is one account per person.

You are a person. You have more than 1 account. That's against the rules.

I don't know why you refer to your business as a "free enterprise" when that's a theory of economics, not a type of business in itself. That's like saying you own a "capitalism." But whatever you call it, the business is not a person and is thus not entitled to any additional accounts. It doesn't need to be specifically forbidden in the rules to be against it - accounts are done by person and the WeCube account is held by people who already have accounts on the forum.

Maybe I should make it a little bit clearer, you are saying it is against the rules for 1 person to have multiple accounts. But I am talking about a group of people (partnership) I do realize it is a economic term, and would you like me to call it a Partnership instead? No, offense. It just does not make sense. This is just like how the Supreme Court interprets the constitution, some justices go one way and others go the other, some are strict intepertists, others interpret the constitution loosely. You see what I am saying?

 

[Nir1213]

Maybe I should make it a little bit clearer, you are saying it is against the rules for 1 person to have multiple accounts. But I am talking about a group of people (partnership) I do realize it is a economic term, and would you like me to call it a Partnership instead? No, offense. It just does not make sense. This is just like how the Supreme Court interprets the constitution, some justices go one way and others go the other, some are strict intepertists, others interpret the constitution loosely. You see what I am saying?

so your not making alt accounts and instead making friends and make a group
well thats fine i guess as long as a user doesnt create more than one acc and uses it

 

[LNBFilms]

Dear fellow Speedsolvers,
I dmed the admin about this issue, and will update y’all when I get news back! If it is against the rules, we will remove it immediately!

 

[Kit Clement]

Maybe I should make it a little bit clearer, you are saying it is against the rules for 1 person to have multiple accounts. But I am talking about a group of people (partnership) I do realize it is a economic term, and would you like me to call it a Partnership instead? No, offense. It just does not make sense. This is just like how the Supreme Court interprets the constitution, some justices go one way and others go the other, some are strict intepertists, others interpret the constitution loosely. You see what I am saying?

I don't see how anyone could not interpret this as being against the rules as written. It's not an issue of re-interpreting a 1700s document of ideals into interpreting laws that the Supreme Court deals with, it's literally that each person is given 1 account, and that rule is clearly broken. But this is a message board, not a country or a legal system. They can enforce things as they please, and as I said, they seem to have no issue with your account given that they saw it and did nothing with merging the thread. Makes no difference to me if you have the account or not anyway, the point I was intending to make is that there's no reason for the introduction thread to be merged given it didn't introduce anyone or anything to the forums.

 

[LNBFilms]

I don't see how anyone could not interpret this as being against the rules as written. It's not an issue of re-interpreting a 1700s document of ideals into interpreting laws that the Supreme Court deals with, it's literally that each person is given 1 account, and that rule is clearly broken. But this is a message board, not a country or a legal system. They can enforce things as they please, and as I said, they seem to have no issue with your account given that they saw it and did nothing with merging the thread. Makes no difference to me if you have the account or not anyway, the point I was intending to make is that there's no reason for the introduction thread to be merged given it didn't introduce anyone or anything to the forums.

Dear Kit Clement,
I thought we established that right away. Sorry about that.

 

[Nir1213]

I don't see how anyone could not interpret this as being against the rules as written. It's not an issue of re-interpreting a 1700s document of ideals into interpreting laws that the Supreme Court deals with, it's literally that each person is given 1 account, and that rule is clearly broken. But this is a message board, not a country or a legal system. They can enforce things as they please, and as I said, they seem to have no issue with your account given that they saw it and did nothing with merging the thread. Makes no difference to me if you have the account or not anyway, the point I was intending to make is that there's no reason for the introduction thread to be merged given it didn't introduce anyone or anything to the forums.

i mean to make things more simple they could make a new forum for business intros.