the_chad
Member
Probably cannot be described as true innovations, however they are changes in design which requires a lot of R&D.
Very much true. Those are not innovations.
Probably cannot be described as true innovations, however they are changes in design which requires a lot of R&D.
Adjustable magnets, primary internals, maglev.Compared to the innovation of the other cube manufacturers you mean ? oh wait ... remind me what changed between the Moyu WRM 2020 and 2021 ?
moyu was called out for this as they should have been. But the difference is, the rs3s are a $10 and $14 cube, not a $75 and $80 cube.or the last 2 versions of the RS3M.
Agreed, they are adding a lot of new things. But are the new things they're adding really even adding much to the cubes?GAN have changed each iteration of the flagship cube more so than any other manufacturer. Sure, complain about the price. But to use lack of innovation as an anti-GAN argument just doesn't cut it.
I don't think anything needs to be added. Cubes are getting more and more complicated, with not much performance change. I'd rather see companies focus on less optimized hardware then continually putting out new flagships that aren't significantly different.What would you like to see added to the cube of tomorrow ?
My point was that using innovation as an argument is moot, so calling GAN out for that it out of line.is not a valid argument as his contention was that $80 for a cube is simply not worth it and there is no pressing reason for the purchases of such. Moreover, I believe most people purchase goods based on the performance, rather than innovation. Not many people care about anything but the end result (including me). Like who cares about how many adjustment levels for magnets or tension there are when its not the first few minutes of getting a new cube?
It requires a lot of R&D? Damn, guess I have to fork out 3 or 4 more RS3Ms for that
ok fine sorry for the ad hominem
Want to list the innovations the other cube manufacturers have done ?Very much true. Those are not innovations.
All manufacturers have done the same when releasing new flagships, it's not just a GAN thing.I don't think anything needs to be added. Cubes are getting more and more complicated, with not much performance change. I'd rather see companies focus on less optimized hardware then continually putting out new flagships that aren't significantly different.
That may be but Moyu didn't innovate that, and you can put money on the fact that GAN had been looking at it for a while before as well. All the manufacturers were.RS3M and Mielong WRM 2021 both came out with Maglev before GAN
You forget that Gan is a Chinese company.The difference between Gan and all the super low cost cubes is they probably actually pay their workers.
Not all company's run sweat shops. Also just think that the cubicle or whoever has to make money too.You forget that Gan is a Chinese company.
Moyu were the first to have factory installed maglev. They were certainly not the innovators of that technology.your question was "Want to list the innovations the other cube manufacturers have done ?"
the answer was Moyu had maglev first.
It doesn't seem like GAN is the Leader In Innovation,.. they're just another cube company doing their thing. There are lots of cube companies doing interesting things. GAN has great marketing and packaging and sells itself as a 'Premium Cube.'
More power to them. I probably have 20+ GAN cubes. They're great. But I have a ton of cubes from Moyu and DaYan that are also great.
it’s not too hard to maglev mod a cube, just buy magnets for the rs3m, it should work the samei am in disappointment