By doing this you, a very experienced delegate broke regulations: 2k6) Does not fulfill the event's requirements (e.g. not knowing how to solve the puzzle). A competitor should not compete with the expectation of a DNF result or an intentionally poor result.
By doing this you competed with the expectation to DNF
By doing this you, a very experienced delegate broke regulations: 2k6) Does not fulfill the event's requirements (e.g. not knowing how to solve the puzzle). A competitor should not compete with the expectation of a DNF result or an intentionally poor result.
By doing this you competed with the expectation to DNF
Just for some context:
1. At this point in the competition we were ahead of schedule
2. I had already gotten poor results and wasn't going to be getting any good results for this average. I was just hoping for a good scramble for attempt 5 to potentially get a PR single (this wasn't pre-meditated).
3. This was a bad scramble so even if I attempted something on it, I wasn't realistically going to get a good result
4. When I saw the pins were all on one side I figured this would be a good teaching opportunity (which it has proved to be)
5. This didn't waste any competition time/resources. 2k6+ gives some additional context that Delegates should only use their discretion to prevent competitors from being a severe detriment to the competition
TLDR, it technically violates 2k6 but isn't an actual issue. That being said, yeah I probably shouldn't have done this