The TSOL method for the 2x2

[Bttyx]

So while searching for the pros and cons for 2x2 methods, I found out that one looking cll is pretty difficult compared to eg. However, cll only has 42 algs. So my goal was to create a method with less than 60 algs but can still be one looked easily.
Steps:
1. separate the colours while making sure the U and d layer can be orientated using oll.(for example sune case on top and pi case on bottom)
2. orient all the edges in one alg while making sure the permutation stays the same(you may think making algs that make sure the permuatation stays the same is stupid, but stay with me)
3. pbl
61 algs total
So by now, many of you are confused and are probably rushing to the comments to say this is not one look, but if you think about it, if you take not of the orientation and permutation at the start, you do not have to pause to recognize pbl after orientating. This makes this a one look method
pros-
easy to one look(beginners could probably do it too)
cases are easy to recognise
cons-
high move count(15 stm)
generally not as good as other methods
2nd step algs(incomplete)(will complete at home):

TSOL

docs.google.com

 

[Phenix]

So while searching for the pros and cons for 2x2 methods, I found out that one looking cll is pretty difficult compared to eg. However, cll only has 42 algs. So my goal was to create a method with less than 60 algs but can still be one looked easily.
Steps:
1. separate the colours while making sure the U and d layer can be orientated using oll.(for example sune case on top and pi case on bottom)
2. orient all the edges in one alg while making sure the permutation stays the same(you may think making algs that make sure the permuatation stays the same is stupid, but stay with me)
3. pbl
So by now, many of you are confused and are probably rushing to the comments to say this is not one look, but if you think about it, if you take not of the orientation and permutation at the start, you do not have to pause to recognize pbl after orientating. This makes this a one look method
pros-
easy to one look(beginners could probably do it too)
cases are easy to recognise
cons-
high move count(15 stm)
generally not as good as other methods
2nd step algs(incomplete)(will complete at home):

TSOL

docs.google.com

This is just Ortega, not even a worse version, just flat out beginner Ortega.

 

[Bttyx]

This is just Ortega, not even a worse version, just flat out beginner Ortega.

actually its completely different read it again

 

[Bttyx]

This is just Ortega, not even a worse version, just flat out beginner Ortega.

in all seriousness though in Ortega, you make a face, in tsol you make a oll case on the bottom layer

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

actually its completely different read it again

No this is basically just bad Ortega
(Make face, opposite face, then pbl)

 

[Bttyx]

No this is basically just bad Ortega
(Make face, opposite face, then pbl)

oh my god is it that hard to understand? You do not make a face, you make an oll case at the d layer. this automatically creates an oll case on the U layer and you orientate it and permuatate it.

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

oh my god is it that hard to understand? You do not make a face, you make an oll case at the d layer. this automatically creates an oll case on the U layer and you orientate it and permuatate it.

are there corner twists parity algs or no?

 

[Bttyx]

are there corner twists parity algs or no?

no

 

[Bttyx]

no

first steps takes average 1-3 moves

 

[Bttyx]

are there corner twists parity algs or no?

only 61 algs

 

[xyzzy]

1. Please stop making new threads for every variation of a method you come up with. We have a thread for that already:

E

Thread 'The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread'

Mar 17, 2013

Please read before posting

I'm making this thread for all of those ideas you have that are interesting, yet are not fully developed. This is a place to post them. I have come up with many ideas and didn't want to post a new thread for every one of them when most don't get very far. Perhaps if an idea gets very far, it may deserve its own thread, but until then, it should go here.

Be open and understanding
Everyone should be open to new ideas, yet also understanding if others don't think it will work.

Post all kinds of ideas
Feel free to post all kinds of ideas...

• elrog
• 1lll 2 gen 2-gen 2gen 3-look 3x3x3 cube beginner cfop eoline; cfop; eocross epll experiment fewest moves fmc fridrich functional help needed hybrid idea ideas intermediate last layer algorithms mcm method method new method ollcp pang petrus petrus method roux rubik's cube zbll
• Replies: 8,800
• Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion

• 

New threads for a method should be reserved for a method that has already been extensively tested or researched, and your threads so far fail to meet this bar.

2. Also, don't make multiple posts in a row. You can reply to multiple people in one post, and also edit your previous post if you want to add something you forgot to say earlier.