The physics of Rubik's Cube to Substep Method Platform

[Deleted member 27249]

I decide to open this Thread for Explain my vision to my Method for Last Layer.
The Platform Is a Method where you solve block 1x1x3 Green or Red or Blue or Orange.
The Standard Model Explain with terms physics a new vision.
String Is cube solved to generate vibrations or Algs infinity vibrations.
Fourk Is situation of Last Layer.
A case Fourk contains four Electrons.
Electron Is a pattern for solve a block.
When you use a vibration in an Electron you create a case Quark with Always three Electrons equal.
Exist 71 Quark but for me are 41 because for me Quark and mirror case Anti-Quark Is a One case.
Exist mirror case for Electrons the Anti-Electrons.
A Quark Is a particle with block and with gluon particle-vibration can change case Quark in two other Quark with rotation corners not block.
Three Quark a connection system a Baryon.
Exist 14 Family of Baryons 4 cases dont have mirror cases and 10 cases have Anti-Baryons cases.
Anti-Gluon Is an inverse alg for gluon for to move with different orientation corners for to create another Quark.
Gluon change orientation others two corners not to block 1x1x3.
This vision used terms for physics but Explain Fourk contains Electrons, an Electron collapse in a Quark connection with other two Quark a Baryon.
Exist Meson a system with only two Quark.
The Baryon I called in 14 family with code the main Quark.
P2, PR, PR4, T0, AH5, LU, S2, S3, SQ, Q14, Y, Y23, DD2, E14.
E14 Is a Meson.
Baryon P2 my favorite contain Quark P2, Quark S2A, Quark A-11.
Only two Quark have olny two Electrons.
What do you think of this?

 

[Deleted member 27249]

The P2, PR, and PR4 baryons use the configuration of the number TREE(3) to define the possible elements. Just imagine how many elements can exist in a finite quantit more than Graham's Number!
T0 and AH5 add mass-related properties. T0 represents gravitational mass, while AH5 represents the proximity of baryons, determining how dense and closely packed they are.
LU increases the distance between baryons.
S2 indicates that a material is closer to a solid state, S3 to a liquid state, SQ to a gaseous state, and Q14 to a plasma-like state.
Y, Y23, and DD2 are stabilizers that slow down decay. Y slows the decay of P2 baryons, Y23 slows the decay of PR baryons, and DD2 slows the decay of PR4 baryons.
The E14 meson represents decay itself: during radioactive decay, a baryon is transformed into this meson.

 

[Deleted member 27249]

TREE(3)-scale combinations are theoretically possible, but many of them decay. The P2, PR, and PR4 configurations always exist within the TREE(3) framework; however, the other baryons also influence stability.
Gigantic elements cannot remain stable because too many P2, PR, and PR4 baryons decay rapidly. The mass of the element itself generates this decay process, ultimately transforming the structure into the E14 meson.
As a result, although an immense number of configurations are possible, only a limited number of elements can exist in a stable form.

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Matter ages into E14 mesons, but the residual String survives and eventually generates new baryons through quantum fluctuations, creating an eternal cycle of matter and existence.

 

[Deleted member 27249]

The Baryon Q14 are similar photon and not decaded.

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Matter ages, light endures, and reality continuously rebuilds itself from the remnants of its own decay.

 

[Billabob]

What?

 

[acrystal]

What?

shouldve have just said hotdog or dumb it down

 

[Martyt7777]

Are all the posts (except for the first one) cubing related?

 

[acrystal]

Are all the posts (except for the first one) cubing related?

cubes and maths related
i choose puzzle theory anyday

 

[Martyt7777]

cubes and maths related
i choose puzzle theory anyday

Idk bro but “Matter ages, light endures, and reality continuously rebuilds itself from the remnants of its own decay.” does not seem cubing related

 

[acrystal]

Idk bro but “Matter ages, light endures, and reality continuously rebuilds itself from the remnants of its own decay.” does not seem cubing related

sounds like the addition of physics aswell

 

[acrystal]

i asked chatgppt
Your idea explains Rubik’s Cube Last Layer cases using physics-style names and concepts. A “Fourk” is a Last Layer case made of four “Electrons,” and each Electron is a pattern used to solve a block. Algorithms are called “vibrations.” When a vibration changes an Electron, it creates a “Quark.” Quarks can join together to form bigger groups called “Baryons.”


You created different Baryon families like P2, PR, and Q14, where each one represents different behaviors such as stability, mass, density, or decay. Some represent states like solid, liquid, gas, or plasma. E14 represents decay, where unstable structures break down over time.


The main idea is that cube patterns constantly change, combine, decay, and reform, similar to matter and particles in physics. Even when structures decay, the original “String” remains and creates new patterns again, forming an endless cycle.

 

[Jared Burkhart]

i asked chatgppt
Your idea explains Rubik’s Cube Last Layer cases using physics-style names and concepts. A “Fourk” is a Last Layer case made of four “Electrons,” and each Electron is a pattern used to solve a block. Algorithms are called “vibrations.” When a vibration changes an Electron, it creates a “Quark.” Quarks can join together to form bigger groups called “Baryons.”


You created different Baryon families like P2, PR, and Q14, where each one represents different behaviors such as stability, mass, density, or decay. Some represent states like solid, liquid, gas, or plasma. E14 represents decay, where unstable structures break down over time.


The main idea is that cube patterns constantly change, combine, decay, and reform, similar to matter and particles in physics. Even when structures decay, the original “String” remains and creates new patterns again, forming an endless cycle.

I am surprised this was not obvious. @Platform has been developing this approach for AGES. And ever since he joined he has been trying to make it known that this approach is superior to OLL and PLL.
This was just a fancy way of naming all the subsets to his technique (like you said) but he categorized them in such a way that one cannot exist without the other (in so many words)
I like his approach. He has every right to popularize it seeing that he invested so much time and effort to organize them and refine them for our benefit.

 

[Martyt7777]

i asked chatgppt
Your idea explains Rubik’s Cube Last Layer cases using physics-style names and concepts. A “Fourk” is a Last Layer case made of four “Electrons,” and each Electron is a pattern used to solve a block. Algorithms are called “vibrations.” When a vibration changes an Electron, it creates a “Quark.” Quarks can join together to form bigger groups called “Baryons.”


You created different Baryon families like P2, PR, and Q14, where each one represents different behaviors such as stability, mass, density, or decay. Some represent states like solid, liquid, gas, or plasma. E14 represents decay, where unstable structures break down over time.


The main idea is that cube patterns constantly change, combine, decay, and reform, similar to matter and particles in physics. Even when structures decay, the original “String” remains and creates new patterns again, forming an endless cycle.

Isn’t an electron made of quarks? How could it turn into a quark?

I don’t understand what are we even talking abt atp

 

[Jared Burkhart]

Isn’t an electron made of quarks? How could it turn into a quark?

I don’t understand what are we even talking abt atp

Electrons are leptons bro.
Unless my research is unreliable (again)
So he is classifying all his groups into smaller and smaller sets if I am not mistaken

 

[Deleted member 27249]

I am surprised this was not obvious. @Platform has been developing this approach for AGES. And ever since he joined he has been trying to make it known that this approach is superior to OLL and PLL.
This was just a fancy way of naming all the subsets to his technique (like you said) but he categorized them in such a way that one cannot exist without the other (in so many words)
I like his approach. He has every right to popularize it seeing that he invested so much time and effort to organize them and refine them for our benefit.

Yes but for me CFOP and CFBL are equal for Speed.

 

[Deleted member 27249]

For me the String: "P2PRPR4T0AH5LUS2S3SQQ14YY23DD2E14"
Is a map for building all cases 1LLL Line.
I added terms of physics for create a simple system for me.
But for me Is a problem find cases for First step and all algs for solve a block I dont have map for this.
Maybe I try to create a map for step One I have an idea.

 

[thecubicwizard]

i wish i understood

 

[Deleted member 27249]

i wish i understood