shadowslice e
Member
This increases the alg count, but why not make it so that you could use TOLL (basically TCLL, but CP is not required) So the steps would follow. EOEdge+1 D-corners, final E-slice edge and corner (corner can be misoriented), TOLL, CP, LEE. I dont know about move-count overall, but could help out with people who have issues with WV recognition, or can't do setups for WV very well.
Well, I still think SLS is better because even with set up it averages <10 moves (STM) which is by itself much fewer than the TOLL (and with this stat I'm not even including the set up for a pair or even pseudo pair as the case may be)- believe me, I checked the algs- that's why I specifically say not to solve the FR edge in that step. In addition, SLS set up is very easy to explain, even to a beginner- find last edge, bring to D-layer (just track it and you won't even have to find it), AUF, insert into correct slot in U-layer (each is listed in the alg set I posted). Basically, (AUF M2 if in upper layer, AUD if in D-layer) AUF, M2, AUF, alg plus the recognition is no harder than TCOLL