• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Should speedcubing community have their own timers?

Should we make our own timers?

  • Yes

    Votes: 44 55.7%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 24 30.4%
  • No

    Votes: 11 13.9%

  • Total voters
    79
defintely! timers with more feature built in such as the WCA 15 sec inspection time, +2 penalty option. or maybe be generate some practice scrambles. Also, more customization features like colors, size, etc

We're getting out of scope here. This comic comes to mind. The reason the speed stacks timer works well and has worked for such a long time is because it's general purpose, it's nothing but a timer with a display port in a portable -durable- form factor. Instead of coming up with something totally new and specific to the current WCA regulations, ask what can be immediately improved about the current timer?
e.g.
- full range of times
- the entire touch pads are capacitive not just the inner area
- grippier rubber feet

Nobody wants to look away from the puzzle just to check how much time they have left to inspect...
A Google Glass app/plugin and you take them off before solving. Google Glasses for all the competitors! /s
 
Who is "we"?

Are there enough members in the community to pay for a short production run of 10,000 timers? Will the community grow enough to justify producing a second batch of timers?

How much money needs to be spent on research and development to produce new timers? Is this greater than the cost of one production run?

Tim.
 
Although SpeedStacks timers have no problem forfilling our needs, I think it would be nice to have timers and mats designed specifically for cubing.

But if any company were to look at designing something, I would hope that they would seek advice from experienced cubers and the WCA first.

I do have a Pic of a timer that is from Speedstacks that is a Cubing exclusive timer.

 
Last edited:
This might work, but what if you heard the beep from a timer within close proximity that isn't your own and mistook it for your own?

Surely there would be very little difference between hearing a different timer beeping or another judge warning at 8 and 12.

I think most people would know when the beep should be coming.
Also, practicing with a speedcubin' timer could potential help you use your inspection time better because you are being warned.
 
Inaccuracy? idk if you mean the legit v1 where the timer was the mat (which had severe inaccuracy), or the v1 without the save buttons.

What severe inaccuracy?

I'm confused by your descriptions "timer was the mat" and "without save buttons" cause you make it sound like that's two different ones. There is only one first gen stackmat, and it fits *both* of those descriptions:

attachment.php
 
What severe inaccuracy?

I'm confused by your descriptions "timer was the mat" and "without save buttons" cause you make it sound like that's two different ones. There is only one first gen stackmat, and it fits *both* of those descriptions:

attachment.php

Most of the Cubers today think of the V1 Stackmat timer that looks allot like the QJ V1 timer and not the mat with the built in timer cause most of us weren't cubing in 2003 when WCA started.
 
Back
Top