Should I learn M2/R2 before being able to blindsolve successfully?

xXzaKerXx

Veteran
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
441
As the title suggests. Should I learn M2/R2 before being able to complete a blindfold solve successfully because i am not sure whether M2 is easier on the brain than old pochmann

please reply soon sorry for bad english
 
In lieu of R2, try other less advanced methods.
They're simpler, and you can get fast in a less amount of time.

M2 should be easier than Old Pochmann, it's the same concept, except using M2 as the swap.

Best of luck in your BLD endeavors.
 
thanks mate but can you recommend any other website that explains M2/R2 in detail because stefan's guide is sort of hard to understand sry stefan
 
Here is an example solve and explanation of the first variation which uses the algorithms which include a 3-cycle of edges.

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16074
I also have a video explaining every detail on youtube.

If you use mirrors, it's only around 40-50 algorithms instead of around 90-100 (84 2GLLs and 4EPLLs + Misc. ELLs).

The second variation, which can solve edges without prior orientation, I haven't explored into very much, because I kinda gave up on ZBLD. It takes wayy too much thinking during execution, and other methods are faster.

I just like it as a fun concept, since it's one of few methods for 3x3 BLD which can influence corners whilst solving edges.

It basically replaces the T, J, and R perms in classic pochmann with the ZBLLs which do double swaps of edges and corners. It has the benefit of classic pochmann's ability to solve both orientation and permutation at once, whilst simplifying the corners.

However... this method takes around the same amount of algorithms, but isn't 2gen, which the first variation is.
It's also more complex, and AUFs are annoying.
 
Last edited:
What is ZBLD? Where can i learn it? Can you please give me all the necessary details thx alot
 
Back
Top