asacuber
Member
He's insane!
(7.67), 5.72, 5.99, (5.52), 6.23 = 5.98 average!
WR#3 too!
lmoa have you even tried rouxImagine how fast he would be if he used CFOP.. wasted potential
why would I do that?lmoa have you even tried roux
BECAUSE ITS A DECENT FREAKING METHOD!! - sincerely, cfop solverwhy would I do that?
Finally someone who's shown that CFOP is not a requirement for speed.
Oh hey, he got some good scrambles and the blocks are quite good compared to his usual blocksImagine how fast he would be if his efficiency was nearly as good as Kian's...
He was a CFOP user lmao. He needs an efficient method to make up for his high movecountImagine how fast he would be if he used CFOP.. wasted potential
They both without doubt are two of the most influential Roux solvers. I just wanted to stress that Sean with his accomplishment has again shown that you don't need CFOP to be fast, not that he was the one to prove Roux's potential. Sorry if this wasn't clear from my initial post.Alex Lau and Kian really disapprove of this message.
Plus Kian is still relevant for OH, he holds both WB rnThey both without doubt are two of the most influential Roux solvers. I just wanted to stress that Sean with his accomplishment has again shown that you don't need CFOP to be fast, not that he was the one to prove Roux's potential. Sorry if this wasn't clear from my initial post.
Not really. Plus efficiency and high move count contradict each other. Roux can be efficient but if you look at someone who just started using roux I guarantee you they won’t be magically efficient just because roux is “an efficient method.” I asked him why he uses Roux and he said he got bored with CFOP.He was a CFOP user lmao. He needs an efficient method to make up for his high movecount
That is awesome! Well done Sean.
He's insane!
(7.67), 5.72, 5.99, (5.52), 6.23 = 5.98 average!
WR#3 too!
lol, have you gotten a sub 6 official average? No I did not think so. Don't tell me that roux is not a good method.Imagine how fast he would be if he used CFOP.. wasted potential