theROUXbiksCube
Member
1.46 - F U' F R U R' U' R U R' U2
x y
R' U' R
D’ R U’ R2’ F R U R U2 R’ U’ (CLL)
14 moves / 1.46 = 9.6 tps. https://goo.gl/ntkt6S
1.46 is an EG-1 not CLL
1.46 - F U' F R U R' U' R U R' U2
x y
R' U' R
D’ R U’ R2’ F R U R U2 R’ U’ (CLL)
14 moves / 1.46 = 9.6 tps. https://goo.gl/ntkt6S
1.46 is an EG-1 not CLL
Fixed. I guess I could say:
WARNING:
NO CLL IS INVOLVED IN THE FOLLOWING AVERAGE. SO DON'T LEARN CLL IF YOU WANT TO GET WR. JUST KIDDING, LEARN IT. BUT IT'S STILL USELESS.
i knowz cll
Congrats Rami, but if I were you I won't solve that cube if I already knew the scramble.
Damn that kid! but how got that kid the scramble? I don't know who has responsibility for scrambles after it is hand over to the scramble table ( the organizer or delegate?) Sorry I just read this thread.
I remember my last 2 competitions, one competitor solve 3x3x3 and after solved he complained it was the same scramble, and I told him that he must tell the judge before solve but delegate allowed him with extra scramble ( I am still confused about it) I think if you knew the scramble the same as before, you must tell the judge and can get the right scramble. But maybe I know just a little about it so I follow what delegate said.
Also, the reasons for why I didn't just ask for an extra scramble to begin with are:
1. He could've been trolling me, knowing that the delegate had just said that no scramble discussion was allowed.
2. Mainly - I wanted to do the solve first so I could see what I'd get just in case the WCA ends up calling it legal. If I reported it immediately, I'd have no chance at a 0.58, but rather just get that extra scramble. By doing what I did, we can decide based on the evidence between the 0.58 and the 4.xx. It's kinda hard to word this, but I hope you guys get what I mean. I wasn't really 100% sure that what happened would violate the regulations, so I decided to do it and then provide the evidence to see if it could be allowed. Kit even said that what I did was a smart choice.
I would not have gotten this if I didn't report it.
What makes you say that?
Oh, whoops. If I did report it before the solve, I wouldn't have done the scramble at all, thus not making it possible to get this WR.
So you're saying you concealed information about knowing the scramble ahead of time in order to increase your chances of getting a world record. Congratulations on getting away with it?
So you're saying you concealed information about knowing the scramble ahead of time in order to increase your chances of getting a world record. Congratulations on getting away with it?
2. Not awarding the solve time would be more unfair than whatever unfairness there might be in the glimpse offered. Rami should not suffer for the incorrect behavior of another competitor.