adimare
Member
Picture this scenario:
1. Usain Bolt wins a gold medal in the Olympics.
2. After competing he comes forward and says that he recently found out that his coach had been giving him anabolic steroids without his knowledge, but decided to race anyway because maybe his coach was just trolling about giving him steroids and he figured that if he competed maybe the Olympic Committee would decide to let him keep his gold medal after coming clean.
Do you think he should retain his gold medal on the grounds that "he shouldn't suffer for something his coach did" and "oh well, he's Usain Bolt, he probably would have won without the steroids anyway"?
1. Usain Bolt wins a gold medal in the Olympics.
2. After competing he comes forward and says that he recently found out that his coach had been giving him anabolic steroids without his knowledge, but decided to race anyway because maybe his coach was just trolling about giving him steroids and he figured that if he competed maybe the Olympic Committee would decide to let him keep his gold medal after coming clean.
Do you think he should retain his gold medal on the grounds that "he shouldn't suffer for something his coach did" and "oh well, he's Usain Bolt, he probably would have won without the steroids anyway"?