Bryan
Premium Member
qq: There are ways to shoot somebody without killing them ..... Keeping him alive only gives him more time to escape by some means (time frame unspecified).
You watch too many movies/TV.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
qq: There are ways to shoot somebody without killing them ..... Keeping him alive only gives him more time to escape by some means (time frame unspecified).
I don't think anyone can know what was going through Bin Laden's mind, except for
a bullet
The judgment was already made by the government many years ago. Keep in mind that the US has essentially been at war with al Qaida, so Osama's viewed not as an international criminal but as a highly important enemy combatant.
Besides, as I said, there was literally no opportunity to give him a trial, since he died in his first physical engagement with US troops. I don't think we could have possibly captured him alive without wasting lots of time and people in the process.
(unrelated to current discussion) My two cents/ opinion. I was watching the news and they said that the us armed forces is highly considering pulling out all troops. I think this is a stupid idea. I don't really see killing Bin Laden like such a huge victory. There is going to be another guy that will come along, take his place and it will all continue. Furthermore it is evident Al Quaida is close to extermination (at least i believe so), so why should we just leave believing we have won when this just gives them time to rebuild and come together. /done
The justice department is part of the government, but you're right, normally the military isn't in charge of sentencing. (Keep in mind Obama was acting as Commander-in-chief of the armed forces - this was a military decision, not one made by the executive branch of the government.) But, in a situation of war or national security, it's pretty standard for the military to decide that certain people can or even should be killed. There would be no way to have war at all without this power. Can you imagine trying to hold a trial for each enemy soldier in a typical battle or skirmish?The governement does not judge people. The justice does. This is Separation of powers.
I don't think killing innocent people is right either (and I don't categorically approve of all actions the USA takes either), but the solution is not to complain about the USA acting as bad guys. That doesn't help anything. The solution is to call for the legal prosecution of the individual people who allowed or ordered it to happen.However, I'm pretty sure that if you make the final count, USA has killed more innocent people than Al Quaeda in the process. I'm not sayng that Ben Laden was a good guy. I'm just saying that the fact that he was a bad guy was used to justify the fact that USA act as bad guys too. And I think this is unnacceptable from a free country.
I don't think killing innocent people is right either (and I don't categorically approve of all actions the USA takes either), but the solution is not to complain about the USA acting as bad guys. That doesn't help anything. The solution is to call for the legal prosecution of the individual people who allowed or ordered it to happen.
The terrorists are gonna get pissed and start bombing everything. Say hello to World War Three.
Al Quaeda is almost destroyed for years. This is just a zombie organisation. So WW3 isn't a serious issue here.
BTW, the way this was handled will undoubtedly be helpfull for islamist organisations, terrorists or not.
The terrorists are gonna get pissed and start bombing everything. Say hello to World War Three.
P.S. RIP Osama![]()