• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Older cubers discussions

I just want to make some public goals for my competition this weekend, so I can't walk them back later. 1 = easy, 2 = match my at-home times, 3 = pie-in-the-sky, what-are-you-smoking.

4x4:
1. Official average (1:45 cutoff)
2. Sub-1:30 average
3. Sub-1:10 single

5x5:
1. Sub-3:10 average (3:30 cutoff)
2. Sub-2:45 average
3. Sub-2:30 average, with sub-2:00 single

6x6:
1. Official single (6:00 time limit)
2. Official mean (5:00 cutoff)
3. Sub-4:30 official mean, with sub-4:00 single

7x7:
1. Official single (10:00 time limit)
2. Sub-7:45 mean (8:00 cutoff)
3. Sub-7:00 mean

Megaminx:
1. Official single (4:00 time limit)
2. Sub-3:10 single
3. Official average (2:30 cutoff, pb single is 2:41 according to cstimer, I thought I had a 2:24 sometime)
 
I just want to make some public goals for my competition this weekend [...]

Here's to a smooth comp and a pile of PBs!

[...] Of course, a random fast one isn't my focus. [...]

Yeah, I'm primarily focused on nudging the average down but I've grown to love outliers. Shortly after I first cracked the sub-30 barrier I got a 22.x that made me think "timer malfunction" for a moment. I could have told myself, intellectually, that I had all the tools to get a 22... but actually seeing one does something to my mental attitude and raises the bar more than I otherwise would.

When I'm warmed up and looking ahead it seems like 23s are the new norm for me now; 23.5 * .6 (rough "outlier factor") = 14.1, so a lucky sub 16 (or even sub 15) isn't crazy. But until I see one on my StackMat display it feels really crazy.
 
I've put in a Bld Accoplishment thread - my first ao5 sub1 in 3bld. Previous was 1:00.xx. But the thing is I couldnt practice for a month because of squized finger. After 40 solves it looks like I'm back. During the brake I've reviewed all my corner comms. Most of new ones i've copied from Ishaan's sheet.
Very nicely done!
 
  • Like
Reactions: h2f
PB and first sub 14 ao12:-

Average of 12: 13.95
1. 15.10 F2 D2 B' U2 R2 F' U2 B' U2 L2 B' R F' L2 U2 L' D F U2 F U
2. (16.92) U' B R F U2 D' R2 U' L F D2 R2 B2 D' B2 D2 R2 U R2 L2
3. 13.37 R2 D R2 B2 R2 F2 D B2 R2 D2 U R' B' D B U F R2 D' R B'
4. (12.72) L2 U L2 U' R2 F2 U2 R2 F2 U L2 R' D L' F' D B2 R' D2 U R'
5. 13.17 D2 R2 D' B2 U L2 B2 L2 D2 F2 L B L' D2 F2 U L2 B L F' D
6. 13.81 U2 F' D2 B2 R2 D2 R2 U2 R2 F' D' L2 B' D2 F2 R F2 D' U'
7. 14.08 U2 F' D' L' B' R B2 U' F' B L' F2 L' D2 R' F2 D2 L' B2 L2 U2
8. 14.06 F2 U F2 D' B2 U' F2 D' R2 B2 D2 L' F D' L B U2 R2 F' D2
9. 13.60 R2 B2 F' L2 B2 D2 R2 D2 F U2 F' U' B F U' R' B' D' B F2
10. 13.71 F2 R2 D2 B2 D L2 D L2 F2 U2 F2 R' D' L2 B2 R2 B D' R' D' R'
11. 14.93 U F2 L2 D' B2 F2 U F2 D' F2 L F D R' D' B F R' B D F'
12. 13.69 U' D' L2 B2 R F L' B' D F R2 U2 L2 F' R2 U2 F U2 F L2
 
PB and first sub 14 ao12:-

Average of 12: 13.95
1. 15.10 F2 D2 B' U2 R2 F' U2 B' U2 L2 B' R F' L2 U2 L' D F U2 F U
2. (16.92) U' B R F U2 D' R2 U' L F D2 R2 B2 D' B2 D2 R2 U R2 L2
3. 13.37 R2 D R2 B2 R2 F2 D B2 R2 D2 U R' B' D B U F R2 D' R B'
4. (12.72) L2 U L2 U' R2 F2 U2 R2 F2 U L2 R' D L' F' D B2 R' D2 U R'
5. 13.17 D2 R2 D' B2 U L2 B2 L2 D2 F2 L B L' D2 F2 U L2 B L F' D
6. 13.81 U2 F' D2 B2 R2 D2 R2 U2 R2 F' D' L2 B' D2 F2 R F2 D' U'
7. 14.08 U2 F' D' L' B' R B2 U' F' B L' F2 L' D2 R' F2 D2 L' B2 L2 U2
8. 14.06 F2 U F2 D' B2 U' F2 D' R2 B2 D2 L' F D' L B U2 R2 F' D2
9. 13.60 R2 B2 F' L2 B2 D2 R2 D2 F U2 F' U' B F U' R' B' D' B F2
10. 13.71 F2 R2 D2 B2 D L2 D L2 F2 U2 F2 R' D' L2 B2 R2 B D' R' D' R'
11. 14.93 U F2 L2 D' B2 F2 U F2 D' F2 L F D R' D' B F R' B D F'
12. 13.69 U' D' L2 B2 R F L' B' D F R2 U2 L2 F' R2 U2 F U2 F L2
Good work!
 
BTW for anyone around my stage of F2L or looking for more advanced F2L cases than the usual last slot lists, JPerm has compiled an awesome list. This is gold (link to a PDF in the description):

Yes I subscribe to him so I saw this. It's a great PDF. I find it difficult to try and include some of the advanced F2L algs I've seen, or maybe it's just me being lazy. Although I would say a majority of my cases match the best cubers on walk through solves I have seen.
 
Yes I subscribe to him so I saw this. It's a great PDF. I find it difficult to try and include some of the advanced F2L algs I've seen, or maybe it's just me being lazy. Although I would say a majority of my cases match the best cubers on walk through solves I have seen.

It's definitely a longer term, slow digestion reference for me. I don't think I could absorb more than one or two new useful things at a time as far as working them into timed solves. It's perfect timing for me because this is something I was going to dig into on my own otherwise and I've been looking for a similar list for ages. Most of the last slot cases are solid for me, including variations for whether or not I want to flip the edge that's in the slot... yet I even picked up a couple tricks that are new to me there.

In figuring out my personal recipe to sub 20 from here, some common culprits for my slower times in no particular order:

*) Botched an established LL alg.
*) OLL recog/AUF pause. Expected and known it'll linger for a while, steadily fixing itself the usual way
*) Botched F2L pair(s) (missolved trying to look ahead, misidentified the target slot)

Those above aren't a major concern and fall under "practice and don't do that"

*) Bad F2L lookahead

Spotty, difficult to predict, difficult to fix simply by concentrating. Spamming is all I know to do here, however I'm beginning to suspect that at my peak my problem is much less about lookahead and more about:

*) Bad F2L recognition
*) Exception F2L cases and angles. One goofy case I'm not fully prepared for can easily eat 2-5 seconds.

It seems silly that it has taken me so long to realize this but as my lookahead improves I'm exposing a serious bottleneck recognizing the case and target slot location quickly. Serious focus on these may benefit me more than better lookahead.

These are where JPerm's list may do wonders. I don't see myself attacking it the same way I would most algsets. Just stop and examine every case that trips me up in a real solve, those that happen most frequently will get fixed through repetition and self-defense against continually looking them up.

*) Slow or botched cross

I keep pushing off cross exercises but it'll be magic for my averages when I get to it. The one common factor in all my best solves: cross was smooth and quick.
 
I missed a perfectly good opportunity for my first sub-10 yesterday.

It was a nice flowing cross+2 followed by a 2 second pause (I got excited and lost my focus), OLL skip then a J-Perm. Time... 10.8s

Doh!

I feel your pain, I had a shoulda-coulda 18-flat full step two days ago (quite good for me). Nothing really lucky other than not being unlucky but then I misread a U Perm as H. Saw it immediately after it was too late to abort, stopped the timer and took a DNF anyway 'cause I wanted to know.

If you were that close once we know you can do it again, at least.
 
Back
Top