h2f
Premium Member
I wish I could understand your vlog![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish I could understand your vlog![]()
Oh please, just use center commsYeah I'm also using U2. I expect that where I'm screwing up is not alternating the inner and outer slices correctly, especially after rotating.
I wish I could understand your vlog.
Centre comms did seem quite easy when I was looking into 4BLD. I'll do it by the end of 2017.Oh please, just use center comms
My way of doing centers in every cube that has them is to set every case up to a commutator that has the swap on one of the E layers (d or u on 4BLD and so on) they are not optimal but they are very easy to figure them out. I'd say the average # of set up moves is around 1.5, best cases have none, worst cases have 3.
Moving the buffer or using wide moves to keep interchangeability while moving targets on the U or D face help for lowering movecount.
With this method, you have 2 layers in which to do the swap on X centers, 3 on 4 centers and 4 with obliques, a lot of freedom to find an easy comm.
Centre comms did seem quite easy when I was looking into 4BLD. I'll do it by the end of 2017.
I haven't done 4BLD at all yet. My current project is corner comms for 3BLD. Once that's done then 4BLD is probably next.Mark, why not by the end of 2016. They are very easy. Just follow Ollie's tutorial. I've started using them when I was over 20 in 4bld.
Well, my approach to centres is the same as for M2, r2 and even corner comms. That is, choose a simple system that is reasonably move efficient, work on minimising thinking and pauses, then incrementally add to it; but do not add things faster than I can assimilate them without increasing pausing. Centre comms are not difficult, but they are not wildly more efficient than advanced U2. The latter is just setups to comms with U interchange rather than comms with E interchange, so similar in concept and move count.Oh please, just use center comms![]()
I haven't done 4BLD at all yet. My current project is corner comms for 3BLD. Once that's done then 4BLD is probably next.
@Shaky Hands - Andy, getting more intrigued by the minute on opening my presents on Monday.
Not really, I think I took it by shape of one of the layers to begin with, other than that solves^3.
Now I can do more or less how I like, doesn't have to be the same way each time.
Start with everything that needs 2, 3 or 4 twists + the 7 one. And I don't use most the solutions on the page, just see it as a simple guide, do what feels best for you, everything depends on the starting state.
The best is to understand what you can do with a certain shape, for most shapes there isn't a "best way".
Sorry to break topic. I just took a few seconds off my 5x5 PB and happened to be filming. Woo!
I wish I could understand your vlog.
Thanks. My tripod doesn't really work at the desk because it blocks me from getting in and out of my chair. So I came up with a funny set up that seems to be working out well. The lighting at my desk is awful, so I bought a clip on LED desk light for cubing, then I remembered I have a little gorilla pod tripod. So I wrapped it around the arm of the LED lamp and put my little Sony Action Cam on it. It looks funny, but it's out of the way and it works great. The best part is I can just leave it set up all the time and turn it on whenever I want to record solves.@earth2dan - Nice single. Really like the camera angle too. You using a tripod there?
Ghost cubes are awesome. I have the cheaper version from Fancun. Took me a little while to get my head around it though, and it is now one of my favourites as it does require a little more thought.And yes, that's a new Mefferts Ghost CubeDid some Christmas shopping today and one of the toy stores had a bunch of twisty puzzles. I caved and bought one. My first ghost cube.
For obliques, I can't even get a success with basic U2 so am not ready to think about comms yet![]()
That's a good point. Maybe comms would be easier, or at least, maybe using a different interchange might be easier, for obliques. I'll have a think about it.I like your approach, but my post was triggered by the above sentence. I have no problems doing obliques sighted and have done them blindfolded ok a couple of times (never tried full 6BLD, though). At this point slow but able beats your current state![]()
Understood, but in a way, this is exactly what I avoid. I like to have structure. Being a computer guy, I see execution kind of like a processor, executing a sequence of instructions created during memo. Each time I encounter a particular instruction, I always do exactly the same thing. The processor has no freedom; given a sequence of instructions, it always executes it the same way, and does not make free choices. The instruction set is also structured, as opposed to learning 376 solutions for 376 instructions. The instructions are grouped logically and within a group the method of execution is systematic and consistent, based on a simple fundamental operation modulated to different operands and perhaps optimised depending on adjacent instructions. Over time, as I observe that certain instructions are executed inefficiently, I adapt or extend the system, but only in ways that preserve the principle and determinism of the system.Besides 4 interchange layers gives you a bit more freedom than one.
Got some cubes from my lovely wife for my birthday today so did an unboxing. Warning its a 30 minute video so completely understand if people dot watch it. The cubes unboxed are:-
Am I the only one who doesn't get cubes for birthday or christmas? I'm jealous