mark49152
Premium Member
Statistical analysis time, folks.
I keep an Excel plot of all my 3x3 averages. Just out of curiosity, I tried adjusting an exponential trend line to converge on different steady state values (i.e. the theoretical fastest I could ever get) and looked at which gave the best fit (R^2) against my data set. Depressingly, by far the best fit is a line that converges on 21 seconds. I hope that doesn't mean it's more than just a temporary plateau!
If I meet the targets I have set for myself this year, culminating in sub-18 by end of year, the trendline that passes through those would see me one day reach a theoretical limit of 15 seconds. If I want to be a sub-10 solver one day, my target this year should be sub-16.5 (although I would be in a retirement home by the time the line intercepts sub-10 anyway).
I keep an Excel plot of all my 3x3 averages. Just out of curiosity, I tried adjusting an exponential trend line to converge on different steady state values (i.e. the theoretical fastest I could ever get) and looked at which gave the best fit (R^2) against my data set. Depressingly, by far the best fit is a line that converges on 21 seconds. I hope that doesn't mean it's more than just a temporary plateau!
If I meet the targets I have set for myself this year, culminating in sub-18 by end of year, the trendline that passes through those would see me one day reach a theoretical limit of 15 seconds. If I want to be a sub-10 solver one day, my target this year should be sub-16.5 (although I would be in a retirement home by the time the line intercepts sub-10 anyway).