I still wonder what Obama has done to get the Nobel Prize.
They say he did a lot (of course, in about half a year . . .) for worldwide communication and understanding between different nations.
I think there are 100 people who should get the price instead of him, there are people fighting for children in poor countries or organisations fighting against the war.
+1 Obama hasn't done much, and most of what he has done, I don't agree with. I don't get it.
Finally I think the Jury just followed the general "Obama-hype". I really appreciate the things he does, but he's a politican, not a pop-star(as he's often seen), so I think its wrong that people all over the world cheer to him as soon as he says "Hi!" . . . . .
+1 again. People see his face like they see it on that infamous hope poster and they support him for change without really knowing what this change is.
I agree completely.
It is said he received this award for reducing the number of Nuclear missiles in the world. But im pretty sure thats his job and should not be given a treat every time he does something he is supposed to
In that case, lets stop honoring those who have served in the military. Also, policeman and firemen obviously don't deserve recognition for their heroics, it's their job!
Also i never said anything about stop honoring those men and women.
you obviously are for Obama and are taking this way to
o personally.
Judging by your response im guessing you dont know why people dont want him to get this award because you hear what you want to hear instead of both sides.
My opinion of Obama is irrelevant. I perfectly understand the opposition to Obama getting the prize and
almost wholeheartedly agree. All I am pointing out is that:
1) The Nobel Peace Prize is overvalued
2) In this case, the prize is being used as a motivator (read my first post)
3) Suggesting that people shouldn't be rewarded for their actions is ridiculous
I will refrain from responding to your misguided personal attack.