New 3x3 Method: F3L Method- (In Progress)

[Edward]

stupid threads FTW

No. They crap up the forum.

lolrandom is not funny
stupid is not funny
Most jokes aren't that funny
nofun.png, but it's the truth.

 

[danthecuber]

No. They crap up the forum.

lolrandom is not funny
stupid is not funny
Most jokes aren't that funny
nofun.png, but it's the truth.

I guess you didn't catch the sarcasm

 

[Edward]

I guess you didn't catch the sarcasm

No because, not to be mean, but that's the kind of post you'd make :Y

 

[EricReese]

How many algs would that even be? Lets assume all edges oriented and you forced a LL skip in inserting the last F2L pair?

 

[Julian]

How many algs would that even be? Lets assume all edges oriented and you forced a LL skip in inserting the last F2L pair?

# of F2L cases * # of ZBLL cases?

 

[miniGOINGS]

# of F2L cases * # of ZBLL cases?

I would think about that * 4 (because of no AUF).

 

[maggot]

wow, im just thinking about what an F3L would be? im thinking of a method that only takes at most 20htm and there are 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 algorithms, in which 1/2 of those are cancelled due to symmetries and such. it'll take me (and google) about 3 years minimum.

recognition is a cinch, just memorize all the algorithms!!

 

[EricReese]

I dont mind AUF at the end..

 

[miniGOINGS]

I dont mind AUF at the end..

What I mean is that it is essentially the number of F2L cases * the number of ZBLL cases not including AUF. If you do F2L and then ZBLL, you can AUF inbetween them, but if you do them together you can't AUF, you have approximately 4 times more algs to learn.

 

[crashdummy001]

This is a great idea. Actually, I have a better one: you one-look the entire cube! It's a forced F2L skip, OLL skip, and PLL skip in one solve! And, you only need to memorize 1,802,166,803,103,743,999 algorithms!

 

[EricReese]

Off top of my head, isnt there like...493 ZBLL cases? Times like..f2l...like 42 f2l cases(forget) That would equal 20,706 cases.

Gogo Chris Tran

 

[Julian]

I think it would he somewhat less than that, because of the F2L cases in which both pieces are trapped in the slot. For these I think you could AUF before the alg.

 

[Dene]

So much for those two years of peace I was looking forward to...

 

[miniGOINGS]

That is true, but for all purposes, it is a ridiculous number to even think about learning. And there are only 6 of those F2L cases out of the 42 like that.

 

[Ranzha]

When edges are oriented and you have the R U R' insert for an F2L pair, the possible LL cases (7776) is the number of algs.
Just for that case.
Since there are 42 standardized F2L cases, 7776 * 42 = 326,592. I doubt this is right.

 

[CubeX]

I've just had ENOUGH of the 4 pages of stupid comments.

What is this forum for?

Happiness, Socialize, Have Fun, Make Friends, Discussions etc.

And what users do here is just mock others of their ideas.

Seriously, you have hurt my feelings, and i think you all should apologize.

I have SERIOUSLY HAD ENOUGH!

 

[Zane_C]

Interesting concept, but it would be much more efficient to just learn speed optimised LL cases.

 

[irontwig]

I don't know tripod finish or L5E perhups?

 

[bluecloe45]

would be a lot of algs.

 

[shelley]

I've just had ENOUGH of the 4 pages of stupid comments.

What is this forum for?

Happiness, Socialize, Have Fun, Make Friends, Discussions etc.

And what users do here is just mock others of their ideas.

Seriously, you have hurt my feelings, and i think you all should apologize.

I have SERIOUSLY HAD ENOUGH!

Post a stupid thread, expect stupid replies. This forum is for speedcubing discussion. We take no responsibility in your happiness. If you can find documentation saying otherwise I'd love to see it.

If you have legitimately come up with a method, by all means come and share it and present it for discussion. A thread saying "I have an idea for an unrealistic method, I don't quite know how it will work, and maybe I'll come up with some algorithms someday" contributes NOTHING. Do you not understand how that is worthless? What kind of replies were you expecting?

You say we mock your ideas, what ideas have you presented outside of uninformed speculation?