[Unofficial] Nakajima 5x5x5 average of 5 - 1:17.23

but none of those were like nakajis solves.....i mean, the two single solves that were sub 1:20 were good, but this was an average by nakaji...he didnt even fist pump at the 1:13 o_O and the others were computer solves and eriks one was 1:33 which wasnt close...and dan doesnt have any averages of 5 or 10 that are that fast
 
but none of those were like nakajis solves.....i mean, the two single solves that were sub 1:20 were good, but this was an average by nakaji...he didnt even fist pump at the 1:13 o_O and the others were computer solves and eriks one was 1:33 which wasnt close...and dan doesnt have any averages of 5 or 10 that are that fast

This is getting amusing.
 
but none of those were like nakajis solves.....i mean, the two single solves that were sub 1:20 were good, but this was an average by nakaji...he didnt even fist pump at the 1:13 o_O and the others were computer solves and eriks one was 1:33 which wasnt close...and dan doesnt have any averages of 5 or 10 that are that fast

Just keep a watch on Dan's youtube channel over the next half hour, he has a big surprise for you.
 
but none of those were like nakajis solves.....i mean, the two single solves that were sub 1:20 were good, but this was an average by nakaji...he didnt even fist pump at the 1:13 o_O and the others were computer solves and eriks one was 1:33 which wasnt close...and dan doesnt have any averages of 5 or 10 that are that fast

yeah Dan's UWR average is really slow.
 
but none of those were like nakajis solves.....i mean, the two single solves that were sub 1:20 were good, but this was an average by nakaji...he didnt even fist pump at the 1:13 o_O and the others were computer solves and eriks one was 1:33 which wasnt close...and dan doesnt have any averages of 5 or 10 that are that fast

yeah Dan's UWR average is really slow.

On tape i meant.....

And nice solve dan, yeah i guess u showed me ur awesome single. Lets see an average that good soon. Btw, is that a PB solve? (Cuz it better be >_<)
 
Last edited:
Dude.. the battle for 5x5 has been on for a while. He just doesn't win. 1:17 isn't fast, it's just lucky. I want to see an average of 12 anywhere near this, or even near my average.

He just doesn't win? Looks like he's winning. How is 1:17 not fast? Lucky? All his solves were basically sub 1.20.

Umm... i have a 1:21 average of 12 and multiple 1:20.xx avg5. Also, if i had a 15s 3x3, I would be averaging 1:15 too...


You make it sound like someone just gave him the ability to do the 3x3 stage in 15 seconds, he practiced and worked hard to get it, maybe you should stop complaining and do the same. And stop arguing with Chris, he's right :P

Internet hug for Dan?

On Topic: That was epic from Nakaji :)
 
Last edited:
Dude.. the battle for 5x5 has been on for a while. He just doesn't win. 1:17 isn't fast, it's just lucky. I want to see an average of 12 anywhere near this, or even near my average.

He just doesn't win? Looks like he's winning. How is 1:17 not fast? Lucky? All his solves were basically sub 1.20.

Umm... i have a 1:21 average of 12 and multiple 1:20.xx avg5. Also, if i had a 15s 3x3, I would be averaging 1:15 too...


You make it sound like someone just gave him the ability to do the 3x3 stage in 15 seconds, he practiced and worked hard to get it, maybe you should stop complaining and do the same. And stop arguing with Chris, he's right :P

Internet hug for Dan?

On Topic: That was epic from Nakaji :)

Did you not see Dan's 1:15, 1:11, and 1:05 where he did have a 15s 3x3 stage?
 
Yeah but what are single times? They prove nothing, averages of 5 are more accurate.

Dan was saying himself that "if i had a 15s 3x3, I would be averaging 1:15 too"

Heck, even i get 15 second 3x3 as well sometimes. But if me edges and centers were like Nakaji's i'd be averaging 1:15 too :)
 
Did you not see Dan's 1:15, 1:11, and 1:05 where he did have a 15s 3x3 stage?

but these are just single solves.....i would like to see an average to see what his real splits are. (as in one RNC average, not just his single solves)...and Dan is the one who was complaining that if he had 15 sec 3x3 then he would be averaging 1:15

EDIT: woops, levi beat me to it :p its true though....you cant say "if i had this then BLAH BLAH BLAH id be averaging BLAH BLAH BLAH" the thing is, you DONT. Just like saying if nakaji had 50 sec reduction, he could pwn all ur asses...but he doesnt (yet) so hes not gonna brag about it.

And for the 1:05 vid by dan, its just as he said isnt it then? That solve wasnt fast, just lucky.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top