Chree
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Messages
- 1,226
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- WCA ID
- 2013BROT01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
It was pretty bad out of the box. I loosened it a bit and threw some maru in and sat down to do some solves. It's fast and stable, cuts past 45. The rounded stickers take a little getting used to, but after an Ao100, recognition sets in and isn't a problem. Got a new PB single of 12.78 (beating 12.84) during that session... but other than that, I think this cube falls flat.
With so many amazing cubes out lately, the only thing that distinguishes the DianMa are its flaws.
The oversized outer layers are initially fun to work with, but I quickly realized that it betrayed my finger tricks and muscle memory. Many times my algs were foiled by my fingers getting in each other's way. Even normal not-at-all-tricky algs like T J and Y perms were messed up this way.
This confused muscle memory resulted in more issues because the DianMa is only too eager to reverse corner cut. During many of these normally easy algs and certain RUF OLLs, my execution would be interrupted by a move cutting the wrong direction. Obvioulsy this is more a problem with the cuber than it is with the cube... but it's simply not an issue that I have on cubes with normal dimensions.
Everyone has already mentioned it, so I will only agree that M slices, S slices, RUD algs (A perm, E perm, Chameleon, Bowtie, G perms R perms...) are all hindered by the thinner slice layers. The smaller targer areas for inner slices, and less clearance for my fat thumb on RUD algs. These are the big reasons this cube can not be my main.
For how cheap the cube is, I don't regret buying it. I'm happy I had a chance to try it out, but it will never be my main. I will not abide by a cube that makes A Perms a chore. It was a very interested experiment, however. I think that if Moyu took this design and re-widened the center layers, it'd be perfectly fine. Although then it would simply resemble the Chilong or the Sulong a little too much.
With so many amazing cubes out lately, the only thing that distinguishes the DianMa are its flaws.
The oversized outer layers are initially fun to work with, but I quickly realized that it betrayed my finger tricks and muscle memory. Many times my algs were foiled by my fingers getting in each other's way. Even normal not-at-all-tricky algs like T J and Y perms were messed up this way.
This confused muscle memory resulted in more issues because the DianMa is only too eager to reverse corner cut. During many of these normally easy algs and certain RUF OLLs, my execution would be interrupted by a move cutting the wrong direction. Obvioulsy this is more a problem with the cuber than it is with the cube... but it's simply not an issue that I have on cubes with normal dimensions.
Everyone has already mentioned it, so I will only agree that M slices, S slices, RUD algs (A perm, E perm, Chameleon, Bowtie, G perms R perms...) are all hindered by the thinner slice layers. The smaller targer areas for inner slices, and less clearance for my fat thumb on RUD algs. These are the big reasons this cube can not be my main.
For how cheap the cube is, I don't regret buying it. I'm happy I had a chance to try it out, but it will never be my main. I will not abide by a cube that makes A Perms a chore. It was a very interested experiment, however. I think that if Moyu took this design and re-widened the center layers, it'd be perfectly fine. Although then it would simply resemble the Chilong or the Sulong a little too much.
Last edited: