Most lucky 5x5 of world top 10 singles!

[Mr Cubism]

The lower % difference between best single vs best average, the higher luck is the single solve, kind of.


Top ten singles

1.Zemdegs 51.09 / 57.64 = 89.6%
2.De Asis 52.65 / 71.59 = 73.5%
3.Nakajima 54.86 / 63.06 = 87%
4.Hays 57.40 / 64.57 = 88.9%
5.Cohen 57.44 / 68.12 = 84.3%
6.Konvittayayotin 59.06 / 66.36 = 89%
7.Halczuk 61.03 / 68.13 = 89.6%
8.Li 64.09 / 72.30 = 88.6%
9.Wang 64.63 / 72.71 = 88.9%
10.Sajima 64.91 / 73.77 = 88%


Top ten lucky singles (compared to the average):

1.De Asis 52.65 / 71.59 = 73.5%
2.Cohen 57.44 / 68.12 = 84.3%
3.Nakajima 54.86 / 63.06 = 87%
4.Sajima 64.91 / 73.77 = 88%
5.Li 64.09 / 72.30 = 88.6%
6.Hays 57.40 / 64.57 = 88.9%
6.Wang 64.63 / 72.71 = 88.9%
8.Konvittayayotin 59.06 / 66.36 = 89%
9.Zemdegs 51.09 / 57.64 = 89.6%
9.Halczuk 61.03 / 68.13 = 89.6%


Summary. De Asis has the most lucky solve by a huge margin.
A single for Zemdegs with that 73.5% difference would end up in a 42.36 single! (57.64 x 0.735)

 

[Dene]

gogo last 4 edges skip + LL skip sub40 XD

 

[Meep]

I think it's moreso being inconsistent in competition lol

 

[Mr Cubism]

I think it's moreso being inconsistent in competition lol

Can be an explanation too Never thought about it.

 

[(X)]

I have 84,6% and that's not because of a lucky solve...

 

[vcuber13]

for me in comp its 0.9358

 

[uberCuber]

I have 83.3% in comp. It wasn't lucky, just most of my solves weren't that good

 

[cubeflip]

interesting statistics! I'm happy that Meep got to hold the WR for a little while.