Stefan
Member
This is a suggestion/request for studying two methods for the 3x3x3 last layer.
Mirek Goljan covered this LL step a while back, finishing the LL after having solved an edge-corner-edge block of it:
http://www.ws.binghamton.edu/fridrich/L1/ece.htm
I don't know whether his algs are optimal, he doesn't provide an average, and also doesn't cover how to get the ECE block. I'd like to know the distribution and average for optimal algs for both steps (getting the ECE block and finishing the LL), both for QTM and HTM. And for building the ECE block there are four possible blocks you could choose from, so fixed-color vs 4-fold color-neutral should be analyzed.
Furthermore, I'd also like to know all this about the "dual version" of it, where corners and edges are switched, so the first step doesn't build an ECE block but a CEC block. I see these potential advantages:
- CEC block might be easier to build. Consider ECE first. If the corner is solved (or just properly oriented), it takes three moves to add one of the edges. For CEC, it takes only one move to add one of the corners. This is overly simplified, but I hope you get the point.
- CEC block can be built 2-gen more often than ECE block. For ECE, you need two adjacent edges to be correctly oriented. For CEC, one correctly oriented edge suffices.
- Fewer cases: The ECE block leaves you in one of 108 cases, the CEC block only in one of 72. Means fewer algs to learn and probably easier/faster recognition.
- After the CEC block, you can't have cases where you need to swap diagonally opposite corners, which I think often require more moves and are uglier than cases swapping adjacent corners (think of the PLLs E, N, V, Y).
- CEC block might be easier to recognize. A built CEC block can be recognized by just looking at one side of the cube (in addition to the LL side which you see anyway), the ECE block requires to see two sides of the cube.
- Compared to PLL, both ECE and CEC might offer quicker recognition of the last step. Move/solve the ECE/CEC block to the back and you can see pretty much all there's left to solved in one glance. Here ECE wins as seeing two sides (plus the LL side) is enough, CEC needs three.
Mirek Goljan covered this LL step a while back, finishing the LL after having solved an edge-corner-edge block of it:
http://www.ws.binghamton.edu/fridrich/L1/ece.htm
I don't know whether his algs are optimal, he doesn't provide an average, and also doesn't cover how to get the ECE block. I'd like to know the distribution and average for optimal algs for both steps (getting the ECE block and finishing the LL), both for QTM and HTM. And for building the ECE block there are four possible blocks you could choose from, so fixed-color vs 4-fold color-neutral should be analyzed.
Furthermore, I'd also like to know all this about the "dual version" of it, where corners and edges are switched, so the first step doesn't build an ECE block but a CEC block. I see these potential advantages:
- CEC block might be easier to build. Consider ECE first. If the corner is solved (or just properly oriented), it takes three moves to add one of the edges. For CEC, it takes only one move to add one of the corners. This is overly simplified, but I hope you get the point.
- CEC block can be built 2-gen more often than ECE block. For ECE, you need two adjacent edges to be correctly oriented. For CEC, one correctly oriented edge suffices.
- Fewer cases: The ECE block leaves you in one of 108 cases, the CEC block only in one of 72. Means fewer algs to learn and probably easier/faster recognition.
- After the CEC block, you can't have cases where you need to swap diagonally opposite corners, which I think often require more moves and are uglier than cases swapping adjacent corners (think of the PLLs E, N, V, Y).
- CEC block might be easier to recognize. A built CEC block can be recognized by just looking at one side of the cube (in addition to the LL side which you see anyway), the ECE block requires to see two sides of the cube.
- Compared to PLL, both ECE and CEC might offer quicker recognition of the last step. Move/solve the ECE/CEC block to the back and you can see pretty much all there's left to solved in one glance. Here ECE wins as seeing two sides (plus the LL side) is enough, CEC needs three.