How many people have you taught to solve cubes?

0
But I taught my sister intuitive f2l and then she didn't want to learn any algs for LL.
 
I taught one friend, as he was the only one that wanted to put the time to learn. I didn't teach him notation or anything. He's bright and has more spacial intelligence than anything else.. he was able to remember what the algorithms were from watching me show him 2-5 times.

He only knows the beginners method, which is all he wants to learn and is satisfied with his progress. I gave him a cube and he solves it time to time, he isn't into the 'sport', if you will.
 
Had a club in high school, and taught some friends in college, ran a puzzle clinic at a math camp for 3 years to teach kids how to solve, have a club at the college where I teach, plus some other miscellaneous friends of friends or friends of siblings = I've probably taught around 200 people to solve the cube since 1998 when I first started.

Chris
Thats a lot. Congratz.
i taught 5 of my freinds how to cube

then we brought all are cubes to school one day and had a race, which i won :D
Yeah I think you have a lil advanage lol. You coulda went easy and went OH while they did 2H or something to make it more fair haha.
I taught my dad how to solve the cross.

I'm pretty proud of myself.
Lol. Good job

Anyhow, I taught my dad the F2L (LBL, but he doesn't want to learn the few algs for LL)
Also, taught a friend the first layer.
Motivated a bunch others over the net also.
 
I taught one friend, as he was the only one that wanted to put the time to learn. I didn't teach him notation or anything. He's bright and has more spacial intelligence than anything else.. he was able to remember what the algorithms were from watching me show him 2-5 times.

He only knows the beginners method, which is all he wants to learn and is satisfied with his progress. I gave him a cube and he solves it time to time, he isn't into the 'sport', if you will.

No notation=good because then he learns from fingertricks and muscle memory, rather than thinking something like "now I do Frooruf (F R U R' U' F' etc [I did that as a beginner...lol])
And also, maybe tell him about Fridrich (don't push him) and people that can sub 13 the cube...that might wanna make him solve more on his own.
 
Just one, my little brother. I got so angry while I was trying to teach him though. I might take him to Berkeley Fall.
 
No notation=good because then he learns from fingertricks and muscle memory, rather than thinking something like "now I do Frooruf (F R U R' U' F' etc [I did that as a beginner...lol])

I completely agree with this. I never teach new cubers notation, nor do I even call the sides correctly most of the time. I usually call the F face "steering wheel" and the U face "helicopter blade." I know it sounds stupid, but after years of asking them to turn the Front face, then having them undo the U layer turn they just did, or something similar for asking them to do U turns, I just switched the names.

I also have a lot of other weird stupid memory mnemonic phrases. For conjugate maneuvers I call them "Baseball throws," or sometimes I use the revolving door analogy that Dan Knights uses, and I never explain commutators as a concept, I just relate them to the conjugates contained within.

So for example, to do an A perm at the last layer I teach them using Joël van Noort's commutator last layer technique (which I think is the best beginner method out there in terms of teaching time and teaching ease, btw) I would show them:
R' D2 R U R' D2 R U R' D2 R U2 R' D2 R

I would call the maneuver R' D2 R a "baseball throw." For example, the exact words I would use with a student to do this A perm are something like:

"The corner in the front here (point to UFR) has (list the three colors you see). This corner is supposed to go back here (point to UBR). But first we need to throw it out of the glove (the UFR position, not the piece) since this glove is holding the wrong baseball (the actual piece in the UFR location - which belongs in the UBR location). To throw it away drop your glove down to the ground (do the R' move), now throw the baseball away from you as far as you can (do the D2 move. Most people ask you here which direction to turn, tell them it does not matter as D2 = (D')2, but explain this to them), and then bring your glove hand back up towards you (do the R move).

Now this destroys the bottom two layers a good bit (tell them not to panic, as sometimes they actually do get really worried here!), but we're going to fix it. We have to helicopter (do some form of U turn) the next piece over to the front here (the UFR location) so that we can catch it. Remember that our baseball (the piece that was in the UFR location before we started) needed to go here (point to UBR). So helicopter that spot over here to the front (Do a U turn so that the UBR location is now at UFR). Now this time we're going to catch the baseball we just threw away. First drop your glove down to the ground (do the R' turn), next the baseball comes rolling towards you and you catch it (do the D2 turn), and finally bring your glove back up toward you (do the R turn)."

Now just repeat the process for the next two conjugate maneuvers of (R' D2 R), and they will have the A perm down. Not only that, but because they learned it as a story, and not an algorithm, they almost never forget it later even if they put the cube down for a couple weeks and then pick it up again later.

Most cubers, I think, would cringe at the terms I am using. However, I have found that 99.9% of people just want to learn how to solve it, and are not interested in speedcubing. For those people I feel it is better to tell them a silly memory mnemonic story as to why they are doing the turns that they do, so that they can remember them. Most people I teach I jokingly tell them that to solve the cube, all you need to do is play baseball over and over (use conjugate maneuvers a LOT) and they can remember that. I never teach them notation, and I only refer to the F face as "front" and the U face as "up" the very first time so that I can tell them which side is the "steering wheel" and which side is the "helicopter blade." It sounds stupid, but people don't mess up with "turn the steering wheel" as often as they do with "turn the front face."

For the rare few who actually do get interested in speedcubing, I tell them that they have to learn the standard notation, so that I can tell them more complicated maneuvers or algorithms much more easily. Usually for these people they are excited to be getting further into the world of cubing so this is no problem. Telling someone who is only interested to solve it once, and just to be able to say that they have done it, will usually drive them away and they don't ever finish learning how to solve in the first place.

Just my two cents,
Chris
 
Last edited:
I taught one friend, as he was the only one that wanted to put the time to learn. I didn't teach him notation or anything. He's bright and has more spacial intelligence than anything else.. he was able to remember what the algorithms were from watching me show him 2-5 times.

He only knows the beginners method, which is all he wants to learn and is satisfied with his progress. I gave him a cube and he solves it time to time, he isn't into the 'sport', if you will.

No notation=good because then he learns from fingertricks and muscle memory, rather than thinking something like "now I do Frooruf (F R U R' U' F' etc [I did that as a beginner...lol])
And also, maybe tell him about Fridrich (don't push him) and people that can sub 13 the cube...that might wanna make him solve more on his own.

HAHAHAHA! I used to do the same thing, and say outloud, "Frooruf," as I was performing the alg.
 
Back
Top