Has fridich ever made you wana crawl up and die!?!?

Dylan

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
36
Basically im getting reallly worked up over f2l and im about to throw away my cubes and have you ever felt this way!?
 
Not to this extent, but I remember being pretty pissed off with f2l.
One day I just sat down and put 100% focus into Kippy33's tutorial. I got it over time. You'll also learn new and advanced tricks as you go along.
 
No i average sub 12 and its actually quite simple once you get passed the 15 second barrier
 
Learning it...no because I was super motivated. But I feel like that when I feel like I'm solving fast but I struggle to get even close to good times.
 
The problem is though i just dont get what shes on about on her website so is there any easier websites? And im not actually gonna crawl up and die :-)
 
F2L can be figured out by yourself. The cases are largely similar and I remember sitting down one day and figuring it all out. There are a couple of strange cases that I use that aren't the same as "the book", per say, but the ways I've figured out is fast anyway.

I suggest you mess around with the cube, try to figure out how to make a F2L pair. Usually this does not take many moves. Intuitive F2L is supposedly better, as far as I know.
 
I never got upset while learning F2L. Sometimes a couple of the LL algorithms bothered me because I could never find any fingertrick-friendly algorithms. It doesn't matter though, 'cause I like Roux, and corners first better.
 
ITT: Every cuber ever on SpeedSolvingdotcom had no difficulty whatsoever with figuring out F2L; they skimmed through a tutorial and within minutes mastered it began averaging sub-10. It was so easy they showed their 10/10 supermodel girlfriend how to do it and even she figured it out, and then they proceeded to make sweet love.

Yes OP, I raged when learning F2L, especially when I first started and became about 20 seconds slower than when I used beginner's. It's an ongoing process, it's been years for me and I'm still learning new things.
 
I'm raging right now at it.

I'm stuck at 22 sec avgs...
I've done it intuitively, then got the best algs for weird cases. I understand how it works, and can do a pair at a time without looking during each pair.
The problem is, though, that I cannot track the pieces as well as I wish. I have to concentrate hard and go slower than usual to track them. But, when I'm timing myself, I tend to not notice, and just speed up, which means I mess up my lookahead, and get slower avgs.

So, I need to concentrate on lookahead and tracking the pieces, and it's making me rage. I just feel like no matter how much I focus on F2L tracking/lookahead, my times are improving by about 1 sec a month...

Which reminds me, anyone know of a F2L tracking/lookahead practice?
I mean, I understand how it works, so I don't need a guide/tutorial. Just wondering if there's a type of practice that focuses on lookahead/tracking, instead of me just doing F2L over and over. I just feel like the way I'm practicing isn't getting me anywhere, and that there's gotta be something better that I don't know about for tracking/lookahead.

But, if there isn't, then I just need to man up, and keep at it.
 
There is a site I keep forgetting to help you recognize corners. I'm sure someone else will read this and know it.
 
Back
Top