Happy and sad cubing moments of the week.

fanwuq

Legend
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
2,831
WCA ID
2008FANW01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Random update.

This post is both happy and sad, but not very happy or sad.
I went to New York so that my grandparents can see some landmarks. I actually wanted to stay home so that I can finish my summer homework and work on BLD edges.
But I took the opportunity to set some records in the category of cubing at landmarks.
http://speedcubing.com/records/recs_fun_landmarks.html
The first day, we went to wall street. I didn't do a speed solve there. I did a 2x2 BLD. I was memorizing while walking. I had to delay the solve for a few minutes. The solve was on video. It was a success!
I only got one nice solve. 17.47 at the statue of liberty. (I beat Chris and Shelley!) I had 4 attempts. First 3 sucked. I got the first solve on video, but not this nice solve. It was timed with my cell phone. The button was small. Could be sub-17 with a nice timer.
Then, at night I went to the top of the Empire state building. The solve was on video. I didn't estimate the time yet. It was alright, but amazing or bad.
The next night, I had 2 horrible solves at central park. I couldn't see a thing. My dad told me it was something like 31 for one and 26 for the other. They are on video.
The day after that, I when to the Rockefeller plaza. There was a sign that says it is a landmark, so I got a video of me solving there. I couldn't focus at all that day, so that solve sucked a lot. Didn't estimate the time, but it could be as bad as 33.
I also cubed a lot on the subway. I had a couple of 2x2 BLDs that I was sure that they broke my PB, but I couldn't time them. One felt like a 5 second memo and a 15 second execution. It was amazing. But I don't know the times for certain. From a few timed solves, I see that I now do average sub-20 memo. I still need to work on my execution. 3-5 seconds per corner is kind of bad.

Here is a sad part. This morning, we returned. My SAT subject test scores arrived. I got 770 on both math and physics. My father was so mad that he smashed my pyraminx, and my friend's crappy 4x4.(there goes my chance of doing a simulated 2x2 multibld 4/4 or some other sort of relays). (Won't break that pyraminx NR; that's for sure.) 770 on physics is a little disappointing. I did a few practice tests before the real one, and I did get some problems wrong, but it was enough to get 800. 770, I suppose, is in the range for a bad day.
For math, it's a joke. The problems were so easy. I could have gotten 800 when I was in 6th grade BLD. I have no clue how it could be. I checked my answers plenty of times too. (I've tried the practice tests years before and recently and I got every question right most of the time. Even when I do my a silly mistake, it's less than 2 mistakes. 770 is probably like the score for getting 5 wrong, which is extremely unlikely. I asked my friend too, and he also only got a 740. ( It was really easy for him too, and he is a bit more careless than me, but it shouldn't be that low.)
This probably means no cubing for a while. Maybe just a few FMC on gabbasoft. :(
 
I think it is ridiculous that you can have a test where the highest possible score is 800 (ranging from 200 to 800), the scores are reported in increments of 10, and a 770 is considered bad enough to have a bad day. Why do they score like that? It makes no sense. All of the best people are bunched up right at 800, and there's no way to tell them apart. It makes it too easy for someone to have a bad day and look much worse than they really are at the subject.

I never took the subject tests when I was in high school, so I really never knew what they were like.
 
I can somewhat understand about physics; the curve is ridiculously generous (I think there was one test two years ago that allowed you to miss 16 questions and still get an 800).

I think your father doesn't understand that college look at SAT scores with a grain of salt; if you're above a certain threshold, you're looked upon the same as anyone else who broke whatever that threshold may be.
 
No... I didn't give a crap about SATs. I did get a 780 on math because I missed 1 free response question... Raw score of 34/35 = not 800 wtf.. Either way, I took the test once, got my grade, and was fine with that. Others take 5 tries and get to pick and choose their best individual section scores and say they are smart because of it. SATs are worthless... period. (BTW, I'm a music major, so SATs really didn't matter ;) )
 
Don't worry about it. Like Dan said, after you graduate, they are worthless. Get into college, then forget about them. Don't stress yourself over these things after they are done.
 
If I'd gotten a 770 on the SAT2 I took, I would've been pretty happy.
Either way, I think it was my guidance counselor who said that nothing really matters other than increments of 50, so a 770 looks about the same as 800.
 
Don't do BLD in public! People will steal stuff from you!

Yeah, Everyone would want to steal a DIY white Type A cube and a ES 2x2. :p

No... I didn't give a crap about SATs. I did get a 780 on math because I missed 1 free response question... Raw score of 34/35 = not 800 wtf.. Either way, I took the test once, got my grade, and was fine with that. Others take 5 tries and get to pick and choose their best individual section scores and say they are smart because of it. SATs are worthless... period. (BTW, I'm a music major, so SATs really didn't matter ;) )

Thanks, man.

I think your father doesn't understand that college look at SAT scores with a grain of salt; if you're above a certain threshold, you're looked upon the same as anyone else who broke whatever that threshold may be.

I can never persuade my parents. They only think 800 is good. They think anything lower means I'll become a beggar on the streets.
They would say, "You will be like one of them beggars who play guitars and stuff on the street. Except you will solve cubes blindfolded. And while you are doing that, another beggar would come and steal your money."
I would admit that I could have been more careful on some problems and avoided DNFing them, but I don't think 770= failing.
 
Last edited:
yeah, don't worry about the score. you'll get into a great school with scores like that and it doesn't matter at all afterwards. sorta like how after when you're finished college nobody gives a damn what your gpa was (except grad schools). no worries about this, here in the real world its about what you do, not what a few meaningless tests say. i hope your father backs off a bit on that.
 
All you high school kids should know that after you graduate, no one could care less about what your SAT score is. It's an absolutely pointless test, that doesn't measure anything.

Actually, it measures how well you take the SAT. Silly, but true. :p

But yeah, everyone else here who's posted is pretty much right on. Although, I think that anyone who brags about his/her SAT score is extremely narcissist.
I can never persuade my parents. They only think 800 is good. They think anything lower means I'll become a beggar on the streets.
They would say, "You will be like one of them beggars who play guitars and stuff on the street. Except you will solve cubes blindfolded. And while you are doing that, another beggar would come and steal your money."
I would admit that I could have been more careful on some problems and avoided DNFing them, but I don't think 770= failing.

All I can say to that is just get into a reasonable college and enjoy your independence then. ;)
 
I was holding off on saying this so you wouldn't feel bad about it, but I simply can't resist.

Exactly how do you smash a pyraminx?
 
Don't do BLD in public! People will steal stuff from you!
I disagree. Start doing a bld when you are alone in a terminal. Open your eyes and see > 50 people around you applauding. Then get in the plane and teach some girls how to solve some puzzles and the flight is over before you want it to be.

And smashing a pyraminx with a hammer is a very bad thing. If that is how your father solves "problems" I don't think he got a perfect score.
 
Back
Top