Fridrich - 2Look OLL/PLL Best Times?

Status
Not open for further replies.
put it this way, 2look OLL roughly doubles the time it takes to do OLL, so if you average 12s with full OLL and spend 2second on OLL, then with two look you'd average 14 seconds. Fast times are possible with 2LOLL, it's just not as fast as full OLL. Many people are in the mid teens or better with two look, but it's not common because full OLL is actually kinda easy to learn, and faster. (It seems scary at first with the huge number of algs, but after a couple of months of learning one a day you'll wonder what the big deal was :) )
 
Well I myself use 2look OLL and 2look PLL, and I average around 25 seconds...

But I am on my way to learning full PLL, and I have been working on look ahead, so maybe that has something to do with my times?

Oh, and my best with 2look OLL and 2look PLL is 18.xy ..
 
did a few solves all around mid-high 12's. As Godmil said it seems like a lot of algorithms at the start but its really not that bad. By learning 1 alg you can inverse it as well as mirror and then inverse it and you've learnt 4 algs. Or learn some edge control and pre-orient edges throughout f2l to avoid bad cases
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top