Foreright
Regular
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
- Messages
- 113
Well, I see my last post in this thread was not very positive xD. I had a pretty long break after this - did the odd slow solve but nothing serious. Decided at the beginning of this month to make a proper push to sub-20 once and for all.
So, ironically, after all that time I’m pretty much back where I started this thread. Decided to do some timed solved and see where I was - result was average of 50 around 23.5 seconds. I remembered O, H, 4/6 Pi and 2/6 T CMLLs with the rest being 2 look.
After 400 or so solves my Ao100s are around 22 seconds. Similar to before, Cubeast shows that my FB is good (enough), CMLL is plenty fast enough, even 2L. LSE is reasonable but could be faster but SB is horrible.
It’s not uncommon for me to get a 24 second solve where the split is 3/12/4/5 or even 20-21 second ones where 10 seconds is spent on just SB.
To combat this I’m doing a lot of slow solving and really looking at my SB pair solutions and making sure they are vaguely optimal. It’s going to be a long job. At the same time I’m really making sure I absolutely plan full FB+Dr edge on almost every solve and that is bringing some results in that there’s significantly less “gap” between FB and SB. I’m still losing sight of SB pieces regularly though. I’m hoping that will get better with time.
Spent some of today drilling the missing CMLls in the sets I already know. I’m now pretty confident with O, H, Pi and T which is pretty great - that’s half of it done already. Going to start drilling U tomorrow if I get a chance.
I’m pretty confident I can get down to below 21 in the next week or so provided I spam enough solves. I’m finding SB pieces easier to find with every solve.
I said this before but I think that to get to sub-20 average I really need a lot better efficiency - partly that will come from more CMLLs. I’m sometimes able to get above 3 TPS which is going to be sufficient, even with 2L CMLL. Part of me thinks “just turn faster” but I’ve noticed that my efficiency REALLY suffers when I do this - like, I can push 3.5 tps but move count goes up into the 70s and above at that point.
So, ironically, after all that time I’m pretty much back where I started this thread. Decided to do some timed solved and see where I was - result was average of 50 around 23.5 seconds. I remembered O, H, 4/6 Pi and 2/6 T CMLLs with the rest being 2 look.
After 400 or so solves my Ao100s are around 22 seconds. Similar to before, Cubeast shows that my FB is good (enough), CMLL is plenty fast enough, even 2L. LSE is reasonable but could be faster but SB is horrible.
It’s not uncommon for me to get a 24 second solve where the split is 3/12/4/5 or even 20-21 second ones where 10 seconds is spent on just SB.
To combat this I’m doing a lot of slow solving and really looking at my SB pair solutions and making sure they are vaguely optimal. It’s going to be a long job. At the same time I’m really making sure I absolutely plan full FB+Dr edge on almost every solve and that is bringing some results in that there’s significantly less “gap” between FB and SB. I’m still losing sight of SB pieces regularly though. I’m hoping that will get better with time.
Spent some of today drilling the missing CMLls in the sets I already know. I’m now pretty confident with O, H, Pi and T which is pretty great - that’s half of it done already. Going to start drilling U tomorrow if I get a chance.
I’m pretty confident I can get down to below 21 in the next week or so provided I spam enough solves. I’m finding SB pieces easier to find with every solve.
I said this before but I think that to get to sub-20 average I really need a lot better efficiency - partly that will come from more CMLLs. I’m sometimes able to get above 3 TPS which is going to be sufficient, even with 2L CMLL. Part of me thinks “just turn faster” but I’ve noticed that my efficiency REALLY suffers when I do this - like, I can push 3.5 tps but move count goes up into the 70s and above at that point.