porkynator
Member
In my opinion this is fake.
I tried to comment the solve, but I don't know his language so I can't understand what he says.
Scramble: R' U' F R U2 R F2 D2 R' B2 R D2 B D' B' U2 F2 D2 R' B2 D' R' F' R' U' F
x2 R' F'
Ok, perfectly fine.
y U2 z F' L F
Uhm what? Why not just R'? I know sometimes it's better not to do the obvious thing, but those 3 extra moves don't seem to help at all.
And why the hell do you do y before U2 or z before F?
R L D'
This step makes sense, although in the video he does the first move as a continuation of the preceding step, which seems illogical.
z F D2 F'
You really don't like that block you built with the first 2 moves, do you?
U2 x' U' y F2 R2 F2 R2 F2
The rotations don't make any sense. Why the last y? You can do F2 R2 F2 R2 F2 but not R2 B2 R2 B2 R2?
I would like to know what he says during the video. He seems to talk quite a lot about the first block and its obvious making, but then he destroys it a few steps later. And does he mention the fact that everything is oriented at some point?
So my reasons for believing this is fake are:
I tried to comment the solve, but I don't know his language so I can't understand what he says.
Scramble: R' U' F R U2 R F2 D2 R' B2 R D2 B D' B' U2 F2 D2 R' B2 D' R' F' R' U' F
x2 R' F'
Ok, perfectly fine.
y U2 z F' L F
Uhm what? Why not just R'? I know sometimes it's better not to do the obvious thing, but those 3 extra moves don't seem to help at all.
And why the hell do you do y before U2 or z before F?
R L D'
This step makes sense, although in the video he does the first move as a continuation of the preceding step, which seems illogical.
z F D2 F'
You really don't like that block you built with the first 2 moves, do you?
U2 x' U' y F2 R2 F2 R2 F2
The rotations don't make any sense. Why the last y? You can do F2 R2 F2 R2 F2 but not R2 B2 R2 B2 R2?
I would like to know what he says during the video. He seems to talk quite a lot about the first block and its obvious making, but then he destroys it a few steps later. And does he mention the fact that everything is oriented at some point?
So my reasons for believing this is fake are:
- Cube Explorer or not, this is a Kociemba solve.
- He does a move (U2 in second step) whose only purpose seems to be destroying the first block while making the second.
- He doesn't use the first block at all in his reasoning (or so it seems).
- Useless and not intuitive rotations.