[Official] Feliks Zemdegs: 9.16 avg, final round of Australian Nationals 2010

RCTACameron said:
KboyForeverB said:
RCTACameron said:
KboyForeverB said:
darn, I look so stupid in the bakground
Click to expand...

You think you look stupid? I was randomly leaning over in the first solve, and then stood up and started clapping when he finished. :p Why was I even there? I must have just been supporting Brian. :)

Edit: It surprises me that Faz never fails under pressure in the finals, or on his last solve of the comp. He actually seems to do better.
Click to expand...
LOL
But how could you have been supporting me when I went first and faz went last, all the other times?? what were you doing
Click to expand...

I don't know, watching? I guess I probably shouldn't have been standing there if I wasn't in the finals. I was so young and foolish then. :)
Click to expand...
blah blah blah
young and foolish, once again
(gonna go now, stop posting)
 
Yes said:
Even if the 9.44+2 wouldn't be a DNF, shouldn't it be a +2 twice (so +2)?
Because he stopped the timer with his wrists...
Click to expand...

"A6i) Time penalties for Ending the Solve are not cumulative. There is a maximum of 1 time penalty for Ending the Solve." If it had two +2s it would have turned into a DNF.
 
Olivér Perge said:
If it had two +2s it would have turned into a DNF.
Click to expand...

I was under the impression that A6i just ment you can't get more than a +2 (ex 2 penalties would still be a +2) but either way misalignment is not counted as a time penalty for ending the solve (it's a time penalty awarded by solved state section of the regs) where stoping with wrists is so in this case it could have been a +4 if the judge had determined that he stoped with his wrists.

Personally I probably would have given a DNF for touching the cube though because he should know better.
 
StefanPochmann said:
Olivér Perge said:
If it had two +2s it would have turned into a DNF.
Click to expand...

Is that in the rules?
Click to expand...

No. The rule says there is maximum of 1 penalty for each state, in my understanding it rather means a DNF, then only one +2.

Come to think of it, the rule says the penalties are not commutative for each state: starting and ending a solve. So if someone starts the solve after a 16 seconds inspection (which is a +2) and stops it with both hands not being flat (also a +2) is it a +4? Again, in my understanding it should be a DNF rather then a +2 or a +4.
 
hr.mohr said:
If I was Olivér I would be cool. Well said Sir!
Click to expand...
Escher said:
hr.mohr said:
If I was Olivér I would be cool. Well said Sir!
Click to expand...

If I was Olivér I would be in love with myself :3
Click to expand...

Thank you guys! ;) (Rowan: That sentence came off slightly weird, but I know what you meant, and I feel the same way. :))

AvGalen said:
bluedasher said:
If I was Erik I'd be scared.
Click to expand...

IamWEB said:
If I was Erik I'd be practicing.
Click to expand...

If any of you were Erik you would be so much cooler ;)
Click to expand...

Not to mention faster, and a proud owner of a general knowledge of competitive speedcubing.

I hope you guys do realize that this was a bad idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Davian
[OcR] Feliks Zemdegs 41.81 5x5 OCR avg
Replies
7
Views
996
abunickabhi
abunickabhi
GAN 356 X
[OcR] Feliks Zemdegs 5x5 Avg OCR - 42.85
Replies
11
Views
2,286
AbsoRuud
AbsoRuud
A
[Unofficial] Feliks Zemdegs 6.65 avg of 5 Camera Angle test
Replies
6
Views
2,818
Arkwell
A
Dene
[WR] Feliks Zemdegs - 7.91 3x3 avg
2 3
Replies
49
Views
20,823
IamWEB
IamWEB
PCwizCube
[WR] 5x5 1:02.93 single and 1:07.59 avg Feliks Zemdegs
2
Replies
29
Views
6,541
PeterV
P
Back
Top