EvanCuber Progression Thread

Mehta has a 45-50 movecount, which is way better than the movecount of CFOP
It isn't. OH CFOP movecount should be lower than normal CFOP. Mehta, on the other hand, shouldn't have a big difference in movecount between 2H and OH because it's heavily alg based. Ultimately, their OH movecounts should be quite similar.
and Mehta is rotationless, which will help avoid table abuse and save a ton of time
As a ZZ solver who solves rotationless, I disagree. Rotations don't take much time, whether it's OH or 2H. And good CFOP solves should only have around 2 on average anyway.

Lastly, erognomics. I argue CFOP has better OH ergonomics than Mehta.

Also, there's the practical disadvantage. You'll have to actively practice 2 completely different methods.
 
Back
Top