I will say that I probably could have worded that better. My point wasn't to act entitled to something I didn't earn. I'm fully aware that I lost to an eligible competitor. My whole point is that the eligibility requirements are stupid.Well, Daniel didn't really address the point fairly either. It's one thing to disagree with how the champions are determined, and another to act entitled for something that was not earned.
If the eligibility requirements allow competitors to represent an area of a country that they don't represent on their WCA profile (which I recognize is different than CUSA), then I fully accept that he "earned" the title. I also am fully within my rights to voice my opinion that that title is now completely meaningless and doesn't represent what it's supposed to at all, and that CUSA's eligibility requirements are absolutely incompetent. They might as well call the title "group of people within this set of strange arbitrary rules champion."
I'm not sure why you think it's "silly" to exclude people from an exclusive title, but you can think whatever weird things you want to.
(no ill intent towards the competitor that won the titles)