• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

csTimer released

I mean, I have a session with 125 times of which 1 is a DNF. And it does not plot anything. If I change the DNF to a normal time, then it plots everything.

It had been a bug several hours before. However, I fixed that about 1 hour ago (10 minutes after the new function released). Maybe you should clean the cache of your browser and refresh the page.
 
It had been a bug several hours before. However, I fixed that about 1 hour ago (10 minutes after the new function released). Maybe you should clean the cache of your browser and refresh the page.

You're fast man!!!! :)
My intention was just to report a possible bug, not put pressure on you. Your timer is excellent and growing better and better.

EDIT: I refreshed the page and now it's working fine, thanks!
 
Thank you for developing such an awesome timer! But I have a question for using the xcross function in toolbox. After choosing insertion finder in tool and pasting scrambles, what should I type in "skeleton" box to make it function?
 
Im having trouble wtih my stackmat hooking up to cstimer. It starts fine but when stopping i have to voilently pound on my timer to make the program stop. Is there a solution to my problem that can be fixed? or do i just need to give up on connecting my stackmat to the program?
 
Just a quick suggestion - I've lost many a solve due to this and I'm sure many others have as well.
When changing a solve to a +2 manually (hovering over the time in the list and selecting +2), I sometimes forget to click back on to the main timer, which means that the timer doesn't start when I press the spacebar down.
I don't tend to look up at all until I've finished a solve so this goes unnoticed 90% of the time.
plsfix
 
Just a quick suggestion - I've lost many a solve due to this and I'm sure many others have as well.
When changing a solve to a +2 manually (hovering over the time in the list and selecting +2), I sometimes forget to click back on to the main timer, which means that the timer doesn't start when I press the spacebar down.
I don't tend to look up at all until I've finished a solve so this goes unnoticed 90% of the time.
plsfix

Why would you assign a +2 that way?
 
Thanks qq280833822 for updating the website :D Although you didn't post about it, I did notice it and I'm very grateful :)
 
This has probably been asked here, but is there a Downloadable version of this timer? I like having big sessions, and when this happens csTimer often lags a ton. It would be nice to have one without this problem (sorry if this is a stupid or obvious question)
 
This has probably been asked here, but is there a Downloadable version of this timer? I like having big sessions, and when this happens csTimer often lags a ton. It would be nice to have one without this problem (sorry if this is a stupid or obvious question)

CStimer only displays 100 times to fix that problem. Try backing up the sessions, clearing your cache, and they restoring the session. It then should only display 100 times (unless you click a button, then it will display all your times)
 
I really love this timer and have been using it as my main timer. Thank You! I have only one thing what I miss from this timer so I do have a suggestions that would be amazing if you could implement. Would be great if You implement an "overall best of" what is not dependent to the session. You could but to Statistics tool or above the scrable, maybe on timer background one of the corner or swicheable. I dont mind where but would be really great this function. I only miss this. Keep up the great work. Thank You!
 
I noticed just now that it seems the calculator for averages has changed slightly. Instead of rounding to the nearest hundredth, it rounds down no matter what, which isn't how the WCA does it. Would it be possible to fix this? I remember it didn't used to do that.
 
I noticed just now that it seems the calculator for averages has changed slightly. Instead of rounding to the nearest hundredth, it rounds down no matter what, which isn't how the WCA does it. Would it be possible to fix this? I remember it didn't used to do that.

Fixed, and thank you for your bug report.
 
Back
Top