tom0989123
Member
hmmm,
There is a chance the original "news" of the sank Titanic might be faked,
Similarly there is a chance that your link provided is totally made up by someone.
How do we trust any new written by actually someone out there?
Because some said "yes it sank",
so anyone said "no it didn't" automatically become the t
I dhmmm,
There is a chance the original "news" of the sank Titanic might be faked,
Similarly there is a chance that your link provided is totally made up by someone.
How do we trust any new written by actually someone out there?
Because some said "yes it sank",
so anyone said "no it didn't" automatically become the truth?
ok finedid you even read ==
1. Wikipedia states the following on the top:
2. The content in your wikipedia link:
He notes that, "since the sister ships had significant interior architectural and design differences, switching them secretly in a week would be nearly impossible from a practical standpoint. A switch would also not be economically worthwhile, since the ship's owners could have simply damaged the ship while docked (for instance, by setting a fire) and collected the insurance money from that "accident," which "would have been far less severe, and infinitely less stupid, than sailing her out into the middle of the Atlantic with thousands of people, and their luggage, on board, and ramming her into an iceberg."
Please do more to support your stand, I dont care if it's sank, i care about how you present your point.