CFOP-Breaker? Mehta method

[Burrito]

I am quite familiar with Mehta, I was onboard with it back in the day. But not anymore.

It doesn’t have 400 algs tho.

APDR sounds good, but there are lots of bad cases.
Same with JTLE.

 

[Swagrid]

It doesn’t have 400 algs tho.

400 more than Petrus does, when using TDR. because EOLE is 50, and TDR 350. And we use TDR to compare because the toss-up for optimal Mehta is either TDR or OS, and since OS is so vague and varies from solver to solver, it can't be easily quantified. So TDR is the way to go for method comparison, and when compared to Petrus, it has 400 extra algs.

 

[Silky]

Almost 20,000 views!

 

[Jack Reiman]

It doesn’t have 400 algs tho.

APDR sounds good, but there are lots of bad cases.
Same with JTLE.

real answer time:

do petrus or apb if you want a good method that's similar, but if you're dead set on using mehta use the 6co/separation variant.

 

[Zeke_beke]

Mehta will never beat cfop

 

[Timona]

Mehta will never beat cfop

Bold statement, but never say never

 

[cuberswoop]

Mehta will never beat cfop

But CFOP will never beat Petrus.

 

[Burrito]

It doesn’t have 400 algs tho.

APDR sounds good, but there are lots of bad cases.
Same with JTLE.

i was so cringe back in the day lmao