Can a Rubik's Magic work with one less string?

Same thing happened to mine, and then another string broke just a few days later. When the 2nd string broke, it was no longer functional.
 
It can work with half of them, unless you're one of those guys that pulls on strings hard like me
 

i didnt notice any difference on it though, but it seems fine to me?

Well your question was if it'll work with one less string, and yes it will. Usually for me, a serious magic solver, after 2 stings break, then I usually take it apart and just add 2 more string so it won't just fall apart on me.
 
Last edited:
Same thing happened to mine, and then another string broke just a few days later. When the 2nd string broke, it was no longer functional.

but it worked when the first one broke?

Yea, it worked fine with 1 string, for a little while.

After reading ianini's post, it just jogged my memory a bit. When the 2nd string broke, I tried to do another solve, and my magic just fell apart.
 
Well the way you restring it is pretty logical. You can count the strings in the intersections to see which are missing. I believe it has something like 16 strings. If 8 break, it is usable (if you're lucky). If you're unlucky, if 2 breaks, then you have to restring.
 
a magic will work, but most likely, it'll die on you if you're not careful.

i can go with 3 missing strings, but i was going for a sub 2 ( i know, so noob)
it fell apart.

what i do when a string is broken, i take it out. then, based on the stringing method, you can decide which string broke, and restring it from there, without taking the whole thing apart.
 
Back
Top