[NAR] Brian Johnson - 0.95 2x2 Single

[Memphis3000]

I don't think anyone could sub 0.69 that

I now agree

 

[AustinReed]

I now agree

Of course.

 

[Deleted member 19792]

I hope there was a huge reaction, because 2x2 singles matter

 

[Tim Major]

8 QTM 0.95, that's actually a respectable 2x2 single, nice

 

[Deleted member 19792]

Video?

 

[Antonie faz fan]

Video?

watch earlier post's plz

 

[Coolster01]

 

[Tim Major]

He solves it with an unbelievable SUB 1 SECOND time !!! He was able to use new algorithms that he learned to abstract the solve down to only 7 moves (spins)

 

[theROUXbiksCube]

He solves it with an unbelievable SUB 1 SECOND time !!! He was able to use new algorithms that he learned to abstract the solve down to only 7 moves (spins)

LOL

 

[rowehessler]

congrats! I was wondering when this would be beaten. good job.

 

[pdilla]

congrats! I was wondering when this would be beaten. Good job.

The love!

 

[JK]

The solve was ridiculous. How did you see that ?

 

[Rubiks560]

The solve was ridiculous. How did you see that ?

It's quite easy to see. It's a 2 move layer into a default CLL.

 

[JK]

It's quite easy to see. It's a 2 move layer into a default CLL.

Still confused.
He said the scramble (inverse of his solution) is U' F R' F' U R U2. Where is the 2 move layer?

 

[Cale S]

Still confused.
He said the scramble (inverse of his solution) is U' F R' F' U R U2. Where is the 2 move layer?

the actual scramble was U R' U' F' R U R' U2 R2 U2 R2

x2 y
U R' // layer
R U R' U' R' F R F' // CLL
U // AUF

with cancellations: x2 y U2 R' U' R' F R F' U

 

[BrianJ]

Sorry about the description. My dad was misinformed.

 

[JK]

the actual scramble was U R' U' F' R U R' U2 R2 U2 R2

x2 y
U R' // layer
R U R' U' R' F R F' // CLL
U // AUF

with cancellations: x2 y U2 R' U' R' F R F' U

Thanks.

 

[Please Dont Ask]

Wait it landed on the timer, So isn't it a +2?
Correct me if i'm wrong

 

[EMI]

What paragraph in the regs are you referring to?

 

[guysensei1]

Wait it landed on the timer, So isn't it a +2?
Correct me if i'm wrong

No it's not a +2.