Memphis3000
Member
I now agree
-
Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!
If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!
[NAR] Brian Johnson - 0.95 2x2 Single
I now agree
AustinReed
Member
Of course.
D
Deleted member 19792
Guest
I hope there was a huge reaction, because 2x2 singles matter 
Tim Major
Platinum Member
8 QTM 0.95, that's actually a respectable 2x2 single, nice
D
Deleted member 19792
Guest
Video?
Antonie faz fan
Member
watch earlier post's plz
Coolster01
Member
Last edited by a moderator:
Tim Major
Platinum Member
He solves it with an unbelievable SUB 1 SECOND time !!! He was able to use new algorithms that he learned to abstract the solve down to only 7 moves (spins)
theROUXbiksCube
Member
LOL
rowehessler
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 877
congrats! I was wondering when this would be beaten. good job.
pdilla
Member
The love!
JK
Member
The solve was ridiculous. How did you see that ?
Rubiks560
Nub
It's quite easy to see. It's a 2 move layer into a default CLL.
JK
Member
Still confused.
He said the scramble (inverse of his solution) is U' F R' F' U R U2. Where is the 2 move layer?
Cale S
Member
the actual scramble was U R' U' F' R U R' U2 R2 U2 R2
x2 y
U R' // layer
R U R' U' R' F R F' // CLL
U // AUF
with cancellations: x2 y U2 R' U' R' F R F' U
BrianJ
Member
Sorry about the description. My dad was misinformed.
JK
Member
Thanks.
Please Dont Ask
Member
Wait it landed on the timer, So isn't it a +2?
Correct me if i'm wrong
Correct me if i'm wrong
EMI
Member
What paragraph in the regs are you referring to?
guysensei1
Member
No it's not a +2.
